8akesale

radio astronomer

you cannot keep me off zhe telescopes
late 20s
agender
ΘΔ, you know how it is wizh spaghetti

atriarch of research
director of zhe Cohost Enclave Space Agency
pfp: meeee
banner: @softtummybitch

kobold60.comi'm a scientistshorter zhan average
longsnake

BEHOLD, ZA CRITTERS

💜@genderdruidflygon
mynoheart@mynotaurusdratini
💚@minecraft & @dragongirlcloacacosmog
💕@bytebatjolteon
🩷@Gyroumbreon
💞@yaodemazoroark
=============
🧡@Seven-Cute-Fishscolipede
=============
♥️@precarioussoulbotporygon
💙@leahpleasebraixen
🩵@saccharinekatlitten
💖@ehksidianlatias
----------------
🤍@dragongirlafrobrionne
🖤@charmytearchen

tattletale
@tattletale

this website i think fundamentally cannot sustain a mass exodus of tumblr users because i dont think it can sustain a mass anything. if i had a fraction of the followers i had on tumblr on this website, like, a tenth, i would immediately feel deeply unsafe at not being able to know how many followers i have (and therefore not knowing e.g. what's reasonably safe to post, how far outside my circle and cultural sphere i can expect posts to end up going, a lot of other things which are pretty important to basic safety as a trans girl online). this hippie burning man 'no numbers ever' shit is borderline unusable. the fact that theres no fucking way to see a post's replies, too! how are you meant to know if a wave of harassment is coming from a specific share? or, stepping away from the safety angle for a moment, have a fucking conversation on here?


tattletale
@tattletale

most of the bad UI stuff is whatever, i know it's a small team and you can't expect sleek functional responsive UI from them and it'll improve eventually. but what i really don't like is the deliberate design decisions that seem (to me) to remove most of the ways that i as a user can actively protect myself! i'm not a baby. i like not being able to see other people's followers and following and likes, i think that was a big part of why tumblr was good and it's good here. but not being able to see shit like how many people you follow (and an apparent ideological resistance to DMs???) is just silly


You must log in to comment.

in reply to @tattletale's post:

Yeah like I can appreciate deemphasising metrics and algorithms but obfuscating social interactions on a website built around social interactions is a baffling move honestly. Like at the very least if you don't want note counts tracked or w/e let us see what tags and additions people have shared posts with. Everything feels so isolated.

literally! i wouldnt care if they just wanted to not show likes/shares or public-facing follower coutns but not being able to go through a version of the tumblr's 'reblogs with comments and tags' section (or even have a unified comments section) is so sucks

The "how do you have a conversation" thing is something that a few of us have been objecting to for a while, yeah. No direct messages, no lists of reblog additions, and it doesn't take very long for comment sections to start looking like this:

screenshot of a comment that is indented so far that it's unreadable

yeah... it sucks because a lot of what i like about tumblr isn't just seeing and making posts but also the ability to interact and have fairly in-depth conversations with multiple participants -- it's something no other site has replicated for me and it's a shame that cohost doesn't do that. ah well

the having conversations bit has always been a big sticking point for me. because i have actually had a lot of conversations about things that people have posted on cohost, but like 90% of those conversations were on discord, with people i'm friends with and know outside of this website. and i don't think that is a good thing.

on some level i hope the influx of users can result in some things changing on this website, at the very least having more actual communists here who decide to stick around, but its very possible i should just be looking for a different website. i have friends who use tumblr and there are certainly a lot of cool people who have (or had, rip) accounts there but the rampant transmisogyny issues always put me off making one myself and that was before the ceo decided to personally join in on it. idk might still be the play though

in reply to @tattletale's post:

and an apparent ideological resistance to DMs???

i don’t think it’s ideological, staff just has Literally Two Programmers so until cohost is profitable a lot of stuff that’s already fairly well served by other platforms won’t be a priority

i can only speak to personal experience but i have been subject to mass online harassment campaigns and never have i thought 'this would be better if i didn't have dms'. quite the opposite in fact because people i knew dmed me support. twitter has the very sensible option to let you choose whether to allow dms from people you dont follow or not -- i think the cohost team's choice is to put it lightly misguided