8akesale

radio astronomer

you cannot keep me off zhe telescopes
late 20s
agender
ΘΔ, you know how it is wizh spaghetti

atriarch of research
director of zhe Cohost Enclave Space Agency
pfp: meeee
banner: @softtummybitch

kobold60.comi'm a scientistshorter zhan average
longsnake

BEHOLD, ZA CRITTERS

💜@genderdruidflygon
mynoheart@mynotaurusdratini
💚@minecraft & @dragongirlcloacacosmog
💕@bytebatjolteon
🩷@Gyroumbreon
💞@yaodemazoroark
=============
🧡@Seven-Cute-Fishscolipede
=============
♥️@precarioussoulbotporygon
💙@leahpleasebraixen
🩵@saccharinekatlitten
💖@ehksidianlatias
----------------
🤍@dragongirlafrobrionne
🖤@charmytearchen

kokoscript
@kokoscript
This page's posts are visible only to users who are logged in.

SomeEgrets
@SomeEgrets

yeah it sure is adequate at cropping and resizing!
also can we trick them into naming it something else?


8akesale
@8akesale

as someone who's used GIMP for over 10 years at zhis point and is actually pretty good at using it:

don't do what i did, i don't want to relearn my workflow so I'm trapped but it's not worzh it i promise

also please change zhe name


You must log in to comment.

in reply to @kokoscript's post:

the best part is it's true

we can also work in about how the project isn't really worked on anymore and point to it still using GTK2 as proof people should move to something more current

i still do not know how to crop or resize on gimp, i just do it through the kde image viewer, it's simple, it's straightforward
gimp still does not have nondestructive layers or multiple layer selection.

everything gimp does krita does better (and that one also has a long way to go) to the point i don't know why someone would seriously recommend gimp to anyone at this point

I've only ever used GIMP and it seems good enough for those things

I've gotten deep enough into it to know that serious editing starts getting really fucked really fast but the few times I've stuck my head into photoshop my reaction was "how the fuck does any of this work?"

None of that is to say anything good or bad about either program, just how my experience with them has gone.

increasingly these days i see ppl clown on it. which is probably deserved? but what do ppl use instead anyway. i made a workflow in it many years ago for image editing but i’m not married to it and it’s not really updating anymore (how long have they been working on version 3 now??) and it has a lot of annoying quirks so. the only other thing i’ve tried is paint.net and i hated it

i use Krita, it has a nicer UI

Gnu IMP has more filters but they are mostly very retro at this point

when it is just basic repetitive tasks then i usually just write a script for imagemagick/graphicsmagick

I need to actually try/learn how to use Krita for basic crops and such. There's no way it's text handling is worse, I don't think that's possible. Having no text functionality is better.

Love imagemagick, I don't have the muscle memory for it down like I do ffmpeg yet.

text is fine in Krita, it uses a pop-up window instead of letting you type right into the image which is annoying, but its very flexible

it does support vectors as well, text layers can be converted to vectors directly for manipulation and all kinds of other things

every layer has a bunch of different border and fill and shown effects that you can use even on bitmap layers which saves a lot of time for these common tasks

the *magick tools also change their interface and break functionality from time to time, it always feels like an adventure, but for batch processing nothing beats it!

in reply to @SomeEgrets's post:

A fork of Gnu IMP with UI/UX fixes so it's less alien to newbies and to folks that want an escape from other industry products. And also change the name maybe to Gnu Raster Image Processor so you can use pithy tag lines like "I got a GRIP on my graphics work process" or any number of puns.

in reply to @8akesale's post: