thinking about sending some suggestions to the federal highway administration for the next edition of the MUTCD, what do you all think
(for those reading this via an embed or RSS reader: click through to the post to see an SVG image)
I π€ asks! Anons open
- OK, so, about that...
- amphobet.carrd.co/
β Leftist π¦ Murican β₯οΈ Undertale/Deltarune Fan
Critical Error
Could not connect to the sushi database. Please try again later. Sorry for the inconvenience.
Dreamwidth
amphobet.dreamwidth.org/Neocities (coming soon)
amphobet.neocities.org/Discord
Amphobet
You must log in to comment.
in reply to @iliana's post:
Looks nice.
I can't speak for other states but people in CT won't read this. Maybe increase contrast or use color red to catch people's attention
I'm a big fan! I'm worried the slightly smaller font and added space in between letters of OR ELSE may violate some standard alphabets rule - does it?
the actual R1-9(a) as of the 11th edition of the MUTCD (chapter 2B, page 82) has the smaller text at bottom; the spacing is also a little bit expanded, although not nearly as much as i did in the sign above lol.
various different signs have adjusted spacing as necessary, most commonly for space reasons on the diamond warning signs. i also think the particular font i have (https://github.com/sammdot/roadgeek-fonts) is not 100% accurate to the spacing specified in Standard Highway Signs and adding spacing is definitely not proportional to that