Alastar Gabriel (but you can call me anything). I'm an ex-professional software developer, now I make weird art and music :p I will give you bug facts unprompted


Twitch, Ko-fi, Neocities, Mastodon


We can be friends but I have to warn you, I am a little awkward and kind of hard to get ahold of :p


ENG/日本語 OK


website
444631.xyz/
Tumblr (I probably won't use this one much)
www.tumblr.com/444631

vectorpoem
@vectorpoem

Compared to text and images and audio, the economics of hosting video seem to overwhelmingly favor massive centralized services. Youtube had an early mover advantage and "won" and Google owns youtube. And they also own Chrome, and control a substantial % of the standards processes governing the web. Also, they are a fucking advertising company.

I've seen some people approach this with "Pay for Youtube Premium then! Show them that there is an eager customer base for non-ad-supported!" but my rather large problem with that is that youtube's "North Star" of maximizing watch time led them to build their business around white male grievance and other such socially corrosive shit, and when you can support individual video creators more directly (eg Patreon, which of course has developed its own problems), rewarding the platform for essentially being the monopolist nobody can afford to walk away from is totally out of the question for me. Hearing from video creator friends about what it's like dealing with a spurious DMCA takedown from some copyright troll makes it very clear to me that this company behaves as if they have no competition. And they're largely correct to assume that.

If I were making this post on Mastodon a bunch of people would show up to recommend PeerTube and while it's neat and I'm glad people built that, it really really does not seem like it or any other decentralized/distributed solution could ever achieve even a fraction of youtube's scale (and many of its users probably argue that that has never been its goal). Like I said, the economics of hosting video are incredibly capital-intensive, and I don't know if that is something we can clever our way past.

This is the part where I'd say "but wait, there's hope! [promising new development] might offer us a way out of this mess" - alas, as the title says, I have no idea where we go from here. I just know that video, more for ill than for good maybe, has attained a frighteningly central social importance and lots of bad things will happen downstream if one of the least responsible companies on earth continues to have a monopoly on it.


bruno
@bruno

I wonder if a big part of why Youtube is such a money pit is not inherent to video hosting but to the fact that Youtube gives free, unlimited video hosting to just anyone, for any purpose.

I've been looking for a new apartment and I realized that YouTube is just, like, subsidising realtors with free video hosting of walkthrough videos. Personal family home videos people pass around. Internal demos or previews of videos that will then later be publicly posted on YouTube as separate videos. There's entire industries that are just leaning on YouTube for free video hosting without thinking about it. Tons and tons of unlisted videos that make them no money or very little money, flowing around.

So I kind of wonder if video hosting is just... something you can actually do if you do it sensibly. Like, Vimeo is still around, and Streamable seems like a sensible solution for actual "I need to host a video" tasks?


secrets
@secrets
Sorry! This post has been deleted by its original author.

You must log in to comment.

in reply to @vectorpoem's post:

I know the reasons for it and all that, but I do find it really funny how the article in question itself is gating most of its information behind a paywall.

As much as I would hate having to watch ads on youtube again, the reason why I would never switch off my adblocker, is because I use it to block most of Youtube's UI as well. Honestly, at this point I find the ability to block entire website elements almost more useful than the blocking ads part, since so much of how commercial websites operate is build around guiding your attention to very specific things, and the ability to just eliminate these patterns is invaluable, to having a somewhat healthy relationship with the Internet. At least for me, that is.

I've seen some people approach this with "Pay for Youtube Premium then! Show them that there is an eager customer base for non-ad-supported!"

(hope quote markdown renders there)
i dont understand how anyones response to youtube forcing ads on people is to give them and how that doesnt play exactly in youtube's hands

depending on how far youtube ends up going there's not a solution that's permanent probably, but for now i've used stuff like piped.video sometimes (anonymous youtube proxy, basically) as well as just keeping my ublock filters up to date / not logging in. i haven't had the anti-adblock prompt show up once

as far as actual fixes. i don't know. i know i don't think FOSS solutions or federated solutions or even cohost-type things can solve what's ultimately a societal problem (and economic problem). systems like youtube and twitter are ultimately something that needs to be a part of a shared commons of some sort or another. but that requires big shifts that aren't going to happen easily. i don't see a clear path

coincidentally, a handful (I think eight?) of the big gun history/demo channels banded together recently and made their own Youtube because of how arbitraryYoutube is with demonetizing, taking down, and delisting their videos. Apparently they signed a two-year contract with Vimeo for hosting. I just saw the announcement today.

in reply to @bruno's post:

I hope this is the case! Monopolies do tend to fall into inefficient decadence like you describe, until some external pressure forces them to tighten the belt (which is inevitably super disruptive to the businesses that have grown in their shade). If nothing else it'd be really nice to see someone "do the math" on a modest hosting operation and break it all the way down.

vimeo has (had?) this model, where you pay for the hosting, rather than to view, and it lost out culturally because of it. even creatives eventually abandoned vimeo when they realized how much more traffic they got on youtube. it’s bleak!

Vimeo's model, implicit in the name, has revolved around restricting traffic to private channels and offering subscribers a broad swath of ways to gate content, which isn't something Youtube is interested in encouraging their customers to do. They're great for, like, corporate internal training videos or setting up some kind of vlog substack or recording a conference or whatever where you don't want maximum possible exposure you want a few hundred paying customers. That's why they've survived (well, more or less lol) and anyone trying to compete with Youtube for lots and lots of engagement numbers from randos hasn't.

It's a relatively limited space that only marginally competes with YT, and if it shows any evidence of growth most likely Microsoft will spin off some kind of video-hosting adjunct to Sharepoint and snap up 80% of the market share overnight.

I think one of the Hard Truths of the internet is that Video is expensive to host, and there's relatively little consumer interest in paying for it. For HD video, you're looking at about 3 GB/hr, which costs about $0.25 in transfer fees (using AWS Cloudfront as an example). If a half-hour video gets 200k views, that costs somebody $25k, and ✨Content Creators✨ don't have that kind of cash lying around. They're trying to make money.

Would you be willing to pay $0.25 to watch that video? Probably! But if you want to pay per-video, PayPal wants $0.30 + 5%, so you're actually paying like $0.60, and half of that is just transaction fees. If you want to get ahead of that, you need to buy "VideoCredits" in like a batch of $10 at a time (non-refundable), and, whoops, we've reinvented centralized video - Netflix or Dropout or something. And are you really going to spend all of that time & mental effort moving money in between buckets, when you can just watch it on YouTube for free?