CERESUltra

Music Nerd, Author, Yote!

  • She/they/it

30s/white/tired/coyote/&
Words are my favorite stim toy


RaziiBerri
@RaziiBerri
This page's posts are visible only to users who are logged in.

doctorwednesday
@doctorwednesday

At some point in the early 2000s fandom crossed over from being primarily rooted in a speculative fiction concept of furries, which required some kind of scientifically plausible origin (they were genetically engineered, they were aliens, there was some kind of convergent evolution, etc) to 'my character looks this way because I like how it looks'... to add to the chorus here in the comments, I felt that shark OCs were the most striking indicator of this change: no one was pretending they had evolved into that shape; their anatomy was fantastical and not only was that fine, but it was unnecessary to devote mental energy to why they look that way.

(this is furries as opposed to toons, of course <3)


doctorwednesday
@doctorwednesday

In fandom there's always been a tension between what different people consider to be 'realistic' attributes, but what seemed to happen around this time was that fans generally became less interested in contemplating that question; expressing themselves through their original characters took priority.


You must log in to comment.

in reply to @RaziiBerri's post:

in reply to @doctorwednesday's post:

The same could be said about ears on shark fursonas, too. There was a time where I'd be all "look at this water sergal, lol" about them, but... it's fine? It's all fantasy animals at the end of the day, as long as it works for you it works.

Come to think of it, probably also why we've seen a loving resurgence of sparkledog OCs as of late.