oh god how did this get here i am not good with computer

 


 

Background music:
Click here because I can't put an audio widget in the profile

 

The scenes with the shark are usually very intense and disturbing.

 

I use Arch BTW

 

Fun fact: Neo-Nazi dipshit cartoonist Stonetoss is in fact Hans Kristian Graebener of Spring, Texas


Codarobo
@Codarobo

I think Disney is more than happy for everyone to think copyright is some sort of “make sure artists get paid” mechanism and not a “make sure disney gets paid” mechanism

It is for real like the trickle down economics of the creative world


Codarobo
@Codarobo

I had some discussion on bluesky about this and a point came out of that re: what I think is actually helpful for artists and it’s this:

Labor rights/law, unions, and UBI/art grants/universal healthcare.

Copyright law might be useful in some cases but it’s not a substitute for these things or sufficient on its own


You must log in to comment.

in reply to @Codarobo's post:

yeah copyright is an ass solution, it's just one of the very few vestigial areas of the law that even purportedly assign workers the right to the fruits of their labor. people tend to latch onto that sometimes but it's only as good as its efficacy as a tool!

Copyright can only compensate you for owning something, not for having made it.

Artists don't get paid or credited because of the time and effort itself or the art itself, they are paid only if they have done right magic ritual before and after that decides if they "own" their own work.

In the current system, it's not really possible to compensate people for their actual work, you can only do it indirectly by grafting "ownership" onto it. The ability to "own" what you made because you "made" it, is very limited and doesn't always apply, and even when it does, the fact that you only get compensated because you own it or hold the "rights" to copy it, instead of get compensated for it's very existence, is proof that even the most well-off creators or laborers are never truly being compensated for their actual work, but rather for taking part in the grand legalese spectacle of it all.

These musings all sound pretty fundamental, so if any part is wrong it'll probably be Very Wrong Very Hard, but i've had them in my head for long enough, that i figure this was a good opportunity to take them out for a test drive in a Replies section.