video games | anarcho-communism | depression | blm | acab | trans rights are human rights | he/him/they/them | like 30 or 40 | movies | Senior Social Media Lead/QA for Mighty Foot Productions | runs @dnf2001rp
This article from wired is one of the most bizarrely insecure and obnoxious things I've seen from any publication in a long time.
It's especially rough seeing the byline of "Wired Staff", I guess I'm done with Wired if this is what they think is worthy of posting.
Article: https://www.wired.com/story/obnoxious-twitter-sign-offs/
...Why would anyone publish this nonsense? Why would anyone care this much about gripes with random Twitter users, and why would you expect anyone else to want to read an article about it? The hell Wired?
Right? That was my exact reaction, and then to put the "Wired Staff" byline on it.. makes the whole company look really stupid and petty.
This reminds me of the article about how people who are "holdouts" and not making a Facebook need to just get with the program if they wanna keep their friends.
There's always this weird insecurity about Social Media Apostacy.
i was expecting an actual article, but no. it's just that. so pathetic what the fuck
imagine paying $5 for this shit
Yeah.. I mostly linked to the article because it seems fake. Sadly not missing anything by not clicking >.<
Jeez, I'd cleared this out of my RSS reader without looking at it under the assumption it was some whiny unsubstantial opinions piece (of which there's been a few lately)... that byline though? 😬
