--

We're your average trans wolf girl(s) furry artists.
Stuck in ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ท
Always open for commissions!!

Minors DNI๐Ÿ”ž

--
Contact info:
Signal: Foxtrot68.67
Discord: foxtrot_68
Telegram: @Foxtrot_68

--

ๆ–‡ๆณ•ใฎใ”ใ‚ใ‚“ใชใ•ใ„ใฎๆ‚ชใ„

--

therian box in two shades of blue, the text reads "this user's theriotype is a gray wolf", there's a picture of a gray wolf on the left and the therianthropy symbol on the top right corner.


โ˜• Ko-fi
ko-fi.com/foxtrot68
๐Ÿพ Patreon
www.patreon.com/foxtrot68

and it made the beatles look like creepy fucking wax figures. I still think about how smooth everyone looks, I don't know how can anyone look at this and think "oh yeah nothing wrong with this image". It feels so off to me, like I'm staring into the uncanny valley of film making. They don't look real with everything being so blurred and smoothed like this. What could've been a fantastic documentary I would've loved to have watched is something off-putting to me because they couldn't do the proper job of transferring the film the right way. I know next to nothing about how this process all works but I know that Star Trek TNG looks really, really good to this day because it was shot on film. When rereleasing the show in HD they did a really good job with remastering all the footage, no magic AI upscaling needed, which meant none of this shit.

a screenshot from the Beatles: Get Back trailer on youtube. Paul McCartney is at the studio playing the bass, you can see a lot of smoothed out features like in his beard, it looks like it was completely blurred over.

look at Paul's beard, just aaaaaaaaaa


You must log in to comment.