🔞No minors🔞

Voted "most likely to become a nothlit" by senior year class.

Manufacture date 1991

Nonhuman θΔ

My silly modded-Minecraft account is over at @worse-than-wolves.

❤️ @Ashto ❤️ @Yaodema ❤️ @Yuria ❤️


Fediverse / Mastodon
chitter.xyz/@gyro
Itaku (JUST made zhis one)
itaku.ee/profile/millielet
Pillowfort (Also just made)
www.pillowfort.social/Gyro

Gyro
@Gyro

The pervasive sense that "everything new is bad" and the culture-wide obsession with past aesthetics are indications of an era with deep-rooted reactionary brainworms I think. Give me a future I haven't seen before. Futurism that is not retrofuturism.


pnictogen-wing
@pnictogen-wing

You're so right about this. modern techbro culture claims to embody The Future™ but their "future" stinks of nostalgia and an unhealthful fixation on a small handful of old sci-fi entertainments from past decades. Merciful stars—they actually think that Blade Runner is something to aspire to, instead of a nightmare dystopia, because they all imagine they'll be in the elite class that gets to have flying cars while everyone else is living in squalor.

But anything that's genuinely new, anything that doesn't obviously line up with their nostalgia, sends all these purported futurists into a panic. I think of how (to pick an obvious example) even though gender transition has been a feature of much written science fiction for decades, it's not an aspect of the mass-market pop sci-fi that furnishes the techbros with the only ideas they have (except perhaps as a cruel joke) and they pop fuses in their brains when confronted with the idea. Same with the notion that people might want to extensively modify their bodies—they panic and start burbling thinly disguised your-body-is-a-temple bullshit.

There's a clear kinship between the stale nostalgic "futurism" of techbro culture and the eschatological daydreams of evangelical Christians who clearly seem to think that their reward for being on Jesus's team is going to be...more of the same. They want an afterlife that's merely a continuation of their present life, but with no enemies around and nothing getting in the way of their desires. Is there any doubt that if the techbros get what they want out of Elon Musk, their high-IQ Martian paradise, they'll be doing all the same shit on Mars that they're already doing?

~Chara


You must log in to comment.

in reply to @Gyro's post:

i have an obsession with past aesthetics because in the past things had an aesthetic.

look at an old TV set from the 1960s though 80s. there is so much freedom for different shapes, different textures, different layouts of controls. chrome, plastic, wood, metal. does it have tuning dials or push buttons? are the push buttons big satisfyingly clunky mechanical ones or are they electrical? is there an LED display or is there a moving needle on a gauge? what does it smell like when it gets warm?

buy a tv in 2024 and congratulations it’s just a black glossy border on an image. there’s nothing there. no human being expressed themselves in the creation of this object.

i am so desperately craving Something instead of nothing. nothing new has been made since like, the iPod?

you say “give me a future” but we don’t even have a present. there is no vibe to anything anymore. Come watch ghostbusters 5. you have no choice, new ideas no longer exist

Minimalism is an aesthetic choice. It is a bad one, it is one I'm tired of. It's possible to come up with new things, but corporations have become obsessed with not looking "cringe" or stupid so they're insistent that everything be done in the style associated with being intellectual, stylish, upper-class in 1997. Do you see it? How this is stuck in the past too, a bygone idea of "classy"?

But in part the effect you're talking about is exactly what I'm complaining about.

Difference, uniqueness, sense-of-place are conceived of as only possible within the past or nostalgic throwbacks to the past. I want a new new. I want a new difference, a new uniqueness, that is not contingent on some earlier decade.

I feel like at this point, we have to make the future ourselves. Getting away from contemporary aesthetics is difficult to say the least, as we're all compelled to interact with these UX/UI experiences to function in society. We won't get any help.

It's difficult to envision anything else. Most any futuristic interface Hollywood puts out tends to be absolutely unusable for more than a minute, and most common folk aren't designers, so all we can do is look to the past where we had wild themes of disembodied heads with speakers for ears for our media players, and think about when gas was way cheaper.

So yeah, the future is up to us, and I don't know what it looks like, though I feel that any honest artistic expression, even if it does lean on past aesthetics, is better than the bland corporate sludge pushed to our phones every day.

I'm a boomershooter enjoyer and I love low-poly stuff, I take part in this as much as anybody and I think a lot of it is good art, too. We kinda can't individually help living in the zeitgeist we're living in, and lots of things are downstream of this.

IDK, there's a lot of good artistic expression that is retro. I just think the fact that so much of it is retro is a bad sign in an abstract way. Like we've given up and we're retreating inward.

I guess it feels like a retreat because it kinda is. Like you've mentioned elsewhere, a group of really shitty people stood up and said, "We are the future" and we've all been suffering because of it, so natural instincts are to "hide" against this aggression into every aspect of our lives.

I have faith it will end, though. Like, it's that whole "we once thought the divine right of kings would never end" sort of thing. There's hard physical limits in this universe, and at some point we're going to have to create something that's post-capitalist. I like to think that I'll see it.