This is where the people I'm following are going, at least.
Raw Data:
| Site | # of links |
|---|---|
| Bluesky | 161 |
| Tumblr | 149 |
| X | 107 |
| Mastodon | 92 |
| Neocities/Nekoweb | 49 |
| 26 | |
| Pillowfort | 26 |
| 21 | |
| Dreamwidth | 15 |
| AO3 | 14 |
| Youtube | 10 |
| Letterboxd | 7 |
| Goblin.band | 6 |
| Nekoweb | 4 |
| Spacehey | 3 |
PAQ (Preemptively Answered Questions)
Q: What is your sample size?
A: Several
Q: Very funny. How many users?
A: I dunno, I just collected data until I got tired of it.
Q: Why are some popular sites missing?
A: There's not a good reason. Some sites I unfortunately did not collect data for, such as FurAffinity and NewGrounds. I regret this oversight, but not enough to start over.
Q: What was your methodology?
A: I went through the list of people I follow. I filtered out anyone that hasn't been active since the news broke. I noted what sites they were linking to.
Q: "Email" isn't a website.
A: That wasn't a question.
Q: I have issues with your methodology
A: So do I. Still not a question though.
