25, white-Latinx, plural trans therian photographer and musician. Anarcha-feminist. Occasionally NSFW

discord: hypatiacoyote


wikispittingace
@wikispittingace

Photobook 1/10/23

_1680273

This marks the first time I've explored more of my county, let alone the city. Having my own car and (for now) a learner's permit lets me explore more than I could as just a tagalong.


_1680276-2

ISO 400 / f5.6 / 1/4000
Barn outside Pottsville, Texas.

Being a driver with photography brain is kinda dangerous. I'm constantly noticing the most mundane thing and wondering if it's worth a shot. With experience, I'll get better at knowing what makes a good roadside portrait.

The gear I brought included my Nikon F4, Panasonic 25mm f1.7, and Albinar 80-200mm f3.9. I ended up using my AF Nikkor 35-70mm f2.8 most of the time. It's incredibly sharp, good range for landscape, and because of its size, lets any passerby or worried property owner know you are just a photographer.

_1680298

_1680302-2

ISO 400 / f5.6 / 1/3200
ISO 400 / f5.6 / 1/2500

F.M. 218 near Indian Gap.
Somehow didn't notice my ISO was so high for the rest of the trip.

One thing I was thinking about is how should I remember these trips. When I get back and start editing, I always fight with myself if I should keep the picture 'true to life' or "Adobe Landscape Color Profile +13 Saturation".

Is it too green? Is it too magenta? Is the grass too yellow or too red? Will someone think it's over-edited? The photograph I take will become the definitive memory, is it important to keep it original and un-stylized?

_1680307

ISO 400 / f5.6 / 1/4000
Zion Evangelical Lutheran Church in Priddy, Texas.
One thing to notice if visiting North Central Texas is the petrified wood.
It's always present in architecture around here.

It's just silly and pretentious to me. IF the camera was jpeg only, that wouldn't represent the ideal 'actual' moment. Nothing could. It's not like future me will ever care about the 'correct' color of grass or red brick because it changed my perception of the memory. Memories are faulty anyway. There's no point worrying yet I still do.

_1680316-2

ISO 400 / f5.6 / 1/1600
.A really good Tree near the Flat Top wind farm.

_1680361

ISO 400 / f5.6 / 1/1600
My beat-up Honda Accord and co-driver.

My plan was to head out towards Democrat Cemetery, a great place name for a very conservative area.

Once we actually got up to the turbines, I realized, how do you actually make them interesting? Or in an English teacher sort of way, how do you communicate their presence through photography?

_1680324

_1680326

ISO 400 / f5.6 / 1/3200
ISO 400 / f5.6 / 1/2500

For me, it's their sheer scale and alien appearance on the horizon. A wind turbine against the blue sky is a totally different experience in person than through a lens. It's akin to photographing the moon.

_1680352

ISO 400 / f2 / 1/5000
Dingo enjoying the sun, couldn't leave without a dog portrait of some sort.

_1680360

ISO 400 / f5.6 / 1/640
A nice cacti.

I took a few shots on film and moved on. I found a really nice sheep farm in the valley as a foreground. It was a nice place to juxtapose such large, alien structures in a familiar rural landscape Simon Stålenhag style.

_1680380-2 _1680393-2

_1680417-Pano

ISO 400 / f5.6 / 1/800
ISO 400 / f5.6 / 1/250
ISO 400 / f5.6 / 1/100

It's always incredible how quickly colors change at sunset. I do love the way the towers change gold near this time.

_1680382

ISO 400 / f5.6 / 1/800

Opposite the sheep was a house and a menacing view of one of the turbines. I took out my falling apart 80-200mm and tried hard to keep it in focus. This is the first time I've used this lens.

_1680395

ISO 400 / f3.9 / 1/250
Albinar 80-200mm f3.9.

Feeling satisfied, I drove home. By blue hour almost every tower was blinking simultaneously. It's actually quite eerie being surrounded by it. That's one thing that's difficult to get across, hundreds of rotating skyscrapers surrounding you. They aren't the subject of a familiar rural landscape, but the context of an otherwise familiar rural landscape.

_1680444

_1680466

ISO 400 / f2.8 / 1/20

This shot was a pain. Shooting a large, clunky, metal lens handheld while matching the shutter with the blink of the towers took an amount of effort. But it was worth it.

Anyway, I hope to explore more this year. I am way more a photographer than writer but hope you found this post interesting.

That's all for now, Jolon.

_1680429


You must log in to comment.

in reply to @wikispittingace's post:

Lots of great photos! And "a really good tree" is a delightful caption.

I agree, a big challenge photographing wind farms is conveying just how friggin huge they are.

Thank you! One of the first photo trends on Cohost was really good trees, I think this one is worthy. Seriously, this farm is clearly visible 100+ miles out at night. This one isn't completed either, it's incredible how massive they are.

this is a really good photo expedition, and I similarly am drawn like a moth to flame with turbines; they are one of the only "future-tech" visions we were promised that feel as alien and imposing as we were promised they would be. my favorite shot is definitely still that blinking-lights one through the fence, although I'm a sucker for a good cinema crop and the panoramic shot of the sunset with the cows in the foreground is also right up my alley.

re: truth in images: I worried a lot along similar lines for a very long time, and I think you have solved your own question in this one post.

"When I get back and start editing, I always fight with myself if I should keep the picture 'true to life' or "Adobe Landscape Color Profile +13 Saturation... ...A wind turbine against the blue sky is a totally different experience in person than through a lens. It's akin to photographing the moon."

you're dead on in your second realization, imho. A photograph, despite our best efforts, can never be "true to life"; while there's value in documenting the world around us, to edit your image for colors and warmth is no different than swapping a film stock. You will remember the feelings of the looming turbine wooshing overhead much more strongly than you will the recall exact scene in your mind, and that's what I try to preserve when I edit - the feeling.

sorry for the long comment, but anyway, just happy to see someone out doing cool photo trips! also great Honda :)

No apology for the long comment! That's one of the things that I like about this site, It encourages conversation to be more thoughtful.

As you said, the experience is what I truly remember. The photograph only serves as a proxy to that feeling, I like that. It's also interesting to me that the slightest color tint does change the feeling I get from a photograph, color science is weird.

I always show a few photos to friends or family before posting. No one thought the blinking lights one was interesting, yet it's my most popular photo on Cohost by far.

The Honda is quite... a car. The previous owner among other things tuned the rear suspension, the result is a car that drifts any chance it gets on dirt roads. It's terrifying.

If you feel like digging deeper into tint, check out some split toning or color grading; the results you can get with that are so good for replicating a Mood.

Also I’ve noticed similar - people who are evaluating photos as photographers or artists tend to appreciate more abstract or creative or technical shots; family and friends tend to go for accurate replication of subject matter or shock and awe. I think it’s because most people still prefer photography as a means of sharing a vista rather than as a purely artistic endeavor, and there’s no wrong way to enjoy it, but it means that shots that knock me off my chair sometimes don’t resonate with a lot of people.

Haha my old prelude was set up like that. Lift-off oversteer is the funnest shit in the world lol