JK-Darkside

bleach fan here for life send help

Big nerd who likes weird games and anime, writes for Hardcore Gaming 101


xkeeper
@xkeeper

here's an archived version from a nitter clone for those who do not have twitter

every time you think "that's awful. surely it can't get worse", good news: it gets worse!


the-doomed-posts-of-muteKi
@the-doomed-posts-of-muteKi

the closest I get to thinking "a crash is good actually" is thinking that a company that cannot support remote work for someone who's also serving as a caregiver for elderly relatives deserves to fail


You must log in to comment.

in reply to @MOOMANiBE's post:

maybe the most fucked part is that this all just sounds like regular corporate tech culture to me tbh. hr seems to often be a joke and there's a bunch of stuff in standard employment contracts that is straight up insane

My now ex-employer had me sign that I wouldn't sue them for violating the US or State of California's constitution for while I had worked there.

Good luck to them having that hold up in court, but it was an insane thing to read as the first two parts of my severance agreement.

Heartbreaking. Genuinely heartbreaking that it's fine to do that to someone. Lie to them, then throw them to the curb.

Like, yeah, read what you sign, get EVERYTHING in writing, never trust another soul above you in a corporation.... but fuck it's still so fucking enragingly heartbreaking that that's fine for everyone involved.

in reply to @xkeeper's post:

Labour will win the next election either later this year or early next, however it will be keir starmer who wins. He's the replacement for corbyn, put there because he's a right leaning wet towel who will bend to everything the press and the aristocracy demands. The conservatives will win the election 5 years after that.

it was really funny (in the same way everything is funny) reading an article today that straight up said "fcc considiering banning one of wall st's favorite ways to control workers" (paraphrasing) -- namely, non-compete clauses

and re: dehumanizing, yeah. turns out "human resources" was a little too apt of a name