arborelia
@arborelia

If you're surrounded by people who call trans people by their deadnames, you're most likely in a hate group. But a possible alternate explanation is that you're in academia. And it's not because that many academics are openly transphobic -- they just don't know that the site they fully trust, Google Scholar, is telling them to do it.

Google Scholar was developed in 2004 and has changed very little since then. It supplanted a lot of hard-to-use library search indices by providing a Google-style interface with a single search box. Now it's the most name-recognized site for searching for almost any paper by almost anyone. One aspect of the design was, authors are just a kind of search term. An author is a cluster of different ways to abbreviate a name, like Firstname Lastname, Firstname M. Lastname, and F Lastname, and you might see different forms in different places, but the underlying name will never change.

This is because Google Scholar was built by, and for, cis men with unchanging Western-style names. The "almost anyone" who you can search for excludes trans people, among a lot of other people it represents poorly. And because Scholar will not change, it should perish.


ireneista
@ireneista

we were at Google during some of these events, but it was before we had much in the way of personal ability to fight for change. we did see trans Googlers (probably different ones than the assimilationists mentioned above) fight for improvement on this front, but unfortunately not in ways that wound up working; the company really only respects showings of hard power.

personally we do believe that there are trans Googlers who still have fight in them. we encourage you to look around at the institutions claiming to represent you and ask whether they do, and, if not, what you might do about it.

do not accept claims that it's necessary to be polite or ask nicely for change. that has never once been true; it only serves the status quo.


Janet
@Janet

The only instance a human should ask another human nicely for something that is afforded to other humans without asking is never.


You must log in to comment.

in reply to @arborelia's post:

Tangential to my point, I have an unconfirmed theory that Google Scholar is the one system at Google that still runs on MapReduce, the architectural anti-pattern that Dean unleashed on the world and set computer science back by years.

That would explain why it's his pet even though it's not his responsibility, and why it takes several months to reindex

Also. When I get a Googler's personal attention with this stuff, they used to say, oh my god that's terrible, I had no idea, I'm going to escalate this to Jeff Dean

They don't say that anymore after 2021, when Timnit Gebru showed everyone that what happens when you bring a serious problem to Jeff Dean's attention is he fires you and lies about you in public

sounds about right. i remember being like super into MapReeuce as a baby compsci, getting a grant to build a cluster then implementing some benchmarks based on workloads that should be as perfect for mapreduce as they could be finding real world perf to be horribly disappointing and pivoting the cluster to a VM farm that ended up being far more useful.

also besides the “accepting Timnit’s offer of resignation” shit (which was an important lesson about legal bullshit) that was clearly kicked off by a knee jerk reaction when someone finally read her paper before an upcoming investment focused period, i have it on good authority that he did very little about other large scale engineering blunders when it came to accessibility concerns.

Woohoo, more reasons to hate Google!

For real though, this is horrible. Wishing the best in getting names changed, or just burning down Google scholar which sounds like the best choice. :eggbug:🔥

Thanks for the write up, really well done.