Sure, most people play WARNO for the online skirmish experience, and Army General may be playable coop/versus
But God-damn, the AI in the game is just stupid. Find a good position and just watch AI throw individual tanks at it in regular intervals.

Military history, video games and miniature wargaming.
RPGs, single player FPS, RTS and 4X, grog games.
Passionate about complaining about Warhammer.
Catholic, socialist, and an LGBT+ ally.
FORUM SIGNATURE:

///

Sure, most people play WARNO for the online skirmish experience, and Army General may be playable coop/versus
But God-damn, the AI in the game is just stupid. Find a good position and just watch AI throw individual tanks at it in regular intervals.
Im also waiting for them to patch accuracy/range… t-34-85s having similar accuracy(even on the move!) and range to cutting edge 80s tanks is just very immersion breaking.
Once thats fixed and AI is tuned up, im very excited. Need more low-APM operational+tactical experiences..
I know a girl who has very well researched opinions on why T-34/85s and other WW2 castoffs shouldn't even be in the game.
Boy, if WARNO is low APM for you, I'm afraid to ask what counts as high 😱
Well, I say its low APM relatively because of:
1)I havent played warno yet but i've played steel divison 2, which im basing this evaluation off of
2)I play entirely in single player, so i can pause. This is huge tbh, most rtses dont really let you issue orders while paused. That's one thing I appreciate about COH3 and AOE3(iirc)
3)Units are often grouped up into cohesive blocks like DOW/COH, theres no worker units, and certain automated behaviors make certain things much easier
For comparison:
RTS I would consider low APM: Rise of Nations
Middle: Age of Empires 2/3/4
High APM rts: Starcraft 1/2, IIRC WC3