• he/him

one more cute disaster… it’s hard here in paradise

last.fm listening



ireneista
@ireneista

The official post-Cohost permanent URL for this piece is https://irenes.space/leaves/2024-09-29-privacy-joke

We have a privacy joke but you need to opt in to personalized avertising before you can hear it.

We have a privacy joke but it's only for groups of 10,000 people or more.

We have a privacy joke but legal wouldn't sign off on explaining the details to the public.

We have a privacy joke but we can't tell it to you without SVP approval.

This is a good email thread, thank you for it. We'd like to mention that we have a privacy joke. Unrelatedly, please put a video call on our calendar if there's anything you'd like to talk about.

We have a privacy joke, but please don't take notes on it.

This privacy joke isn't intended to track anyone, it's meant for very large groups of people such as 100,000 or more. However, we can't promise we won't tell it to individuals.

We've established an independent oversight body to tell privacy jokes. The committee members include our chief legal officer and a former spokesperson for the Department of Defense.

We take privacy jokes very seriously, which is why we can't tell you any.

This privacy joke is extremely funny. That's our promise to you, the user. Unfortunately we can't explain why, for business reasons.

This privacy joke can only be appreciated with the help of some PhD-level math, but trust us, it's funny!

At least one of these privacy jokes is funny, but you gain no knowledge about which one.

The researchers who invented the techniques used in this privacy joke would be surprised to learn anyone has applied their work, but please take our word that it's funny.

We can't tell you this privacy joke because your laughter might identify you.

We had a privacy joke but it's past the retention period, so we don't have a record of it anymore.

There's no point in telling you this privacy joke, because you could already get more personal information from an earlier joke.

We have two versions of this privacy joke, depending on whether you've opted in to tracking or not.

A researcher tried to do a study of this privacy joke, but unfortunately the wording confused them.

We have several different versions of this privacy joke, depending on the applicable jurisdiction, but unfortunately we weren't able to figure out where you are so we can't tell it to you.

You need to sign in so we know who you are, before we can tell you this privacy joke.

If you don't want us to tell you this privacy joke, you need to sign out.

Please click "yes" to acknowledge that we have told you a privacy joke. If you disagree, you can click "no" to acknowledge that we have told you a privacy joke.

We can safely assume that you have consented to hear this privacy joke, because our business model relies on you hearing it.

While it is mandated by the GDPR that we tell you a privacy joke, the details are left up to the member states, and are not yet final.

The wording of this privacy joke appears to contradict well-established practices, so if it comes up in court we intend to argue that it's impossible to tell it to you.

This privacy joke is an attorney-client work product, and its details are privileged and confidential, which is why you are reading it on this billboard.

ATTORNEY-CLIENT COMMUNICATION; PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL Does anybody want to buy some girl scout cookies from our daughter? She said they're a privacy joke.

Privacy jokes should be incorporated into your product or feature from the earliest stages of its design. You are coming to us for the first time to hear a privacy joke before your public launch tomorrow. Do you see the problem? ... Thank you for your patience; joke approved.

This website tells you a privacy joke. That's all we're required to say, under the law.

You can opt out of hearing this privacy joke by sending a written letter to our corporate office in Dublin. If you need the address of that office, please ask your legal counsel.

This privacy joke does not use your microphone. It doesn't need to, because we know everything about you from other sources anyway.

Your response to this privacy joke will be reported only in aggregated form. We're hoping that distracts you from the fact that anyone can buy an ad targeting you, specifically, by name.

Your laughter at this privacy joke, if any, will be reported only in aggregated form. People reading the report will not be able to tell who you are, only where you live and what your name is.

If you would like us to delete all records of telling you this privacy joke, click here and we will process the deletion as soon as we can. "As soon as we can" is defined to mean sometime before the heat-death of the universe.

If you would like us to delete all records of telling you this privacy joke, click on this "delete" button. For business reasons, we will retain a record that you clicked on the "delete" button.

If you would like to delete your account, click here. Any attempt within the next 30 days to verify that it worked, will cancel the deletion, like Orpheus escorting Eurydice out of the underworld.

If you would like us to forget any privacy jokes we've told you, please create an account.

We will not tell you any privacy jokes without your express written consent, which you give us in perpetuity by clicking "okay".

We will use your laughter at this privacy joke only for the purposes enumerated here:

  • Targeting you for advertising
  • Legal requests from CBP or ICE
  • Any other purpose we think of later

If you would like to hear a privacy joke, buy us a coffee next time you see us at a conference. We can't tell it properly on Twitter.

[This one is by a friend.] We (flip a coin)... don't have a privacy joke for you.

The trick to writing these privacy jokes without getting into legal hot water was removing just enough detail that none of them are about any single situation we've encountered.

The meta-circular irony of that was not lost on us.

[This was a thread on the other site; we didn't want to lose it.]



nazgul
@nazgul

I can't answer this for twitter, but I can tell you how it works elsewhere.

  1. When you start a new project, one of the first things you do is talk to the appropriate privacy managers for that area, to get an idea of what concerns they'll have and what they want to see.
  2. Unless they tell you that you're fine (which basically is only going to happen if what you are doing either never touches user data, or doesn't do anything differently than existing features) you write up a very detailed description of the feature, the behavior, what user data it uses, how it will be used, where it will stored, and how long it will be stored.
  3. That writeup is reviewed. Everything is documented and stored so the FTC can see it. Product changes likely may be proposed. This process will take weeks.
  4. Every time any code is checked in, the programmer and reviewer have to confirm that this code either doesn't touch user data, or has been approved under the aegis of an existing project (you have to provide the ID of the approval).
  5. Product changes may have to repeat the process.

Privacy reviews of code changes, and requests to access user data (Meta has ACLs on their databases at the field level), can be approved anywhere from within minutes (if it's something that can be reviewed automatically) to days to weeks. The FTC is not fooling around, and their fines are not small. In the past Meta has been hit with a $5 billion dollar fine. Twitter recently settled an agreement with the FTC on a $150 million dollar fine.

As @popehat@masthead.social says on Twitter (https://twitter.com/Popehat/status/1590770084276232192?s=20&t=Gm9AcXTAxqoVPs_PqLCp4w), judges are really deferential to the FTC.

Your client may not go to jail, but your client's assets WILL be frozen and their company WILL be shut down and multiple restrictions WILL be imposed with, shall we say, a less factually and legally robust basis that you would expect. It's deeply unsettling.

Elon has no idea what kind of trouble he is in for.


ireneista
@ireneista

yep! we can attest that we've been part of this process elsewhere, and this is a good description of it. Twitter's consent decree is actually somewhat stronger than the rest of the industry's, it has some novel provisions that haven't been tested yet, so let's see what the FTC does...



samperson
@samperson

hit that 'show embed' button. play with it!

Neopets is a fallen empire, and we are the rising star.

I love this website and its many neato cool posting features - so today, my friends and I have 'made a new feature' on cohost: Adoptable, in-post virtual pets.

And the best part? None of them are even going to die this time, unlike our Twitter version.

It's free, and you can grab one right now by SLAMMING that 'adopt' button. Simple as that. I'm gonna post a full accounting of the development of this soon, new credits will soon follow, now ADOPT, ADOPT, ADOPT NOW


aidan
@aidan

hahah holy shit

rare and bootleg eggbugs seem highly plausible in this simulation :host-love: