• She/Her They/Them Fae/faer

Commie non-binary trans woman.


MOOMANiBE
@MOOMANiBE

Nintendo's attitude towards continuity is very clearly like my attitude towards a charcuterie board; you take the bits you find interesting and leave the rest where it is. That's fine! I don't think continuity is a necessary ingredient in anything! But their recent insistence that there's a "timeline" that's real and definitely exists and isn't just an excuse to sell books to fans is so transparent I kind of can't believe they keep announcing things like this with a straight face


You must log in to comment.

in reply to @MOOMANiBE's post:

NGL I think the concept of making one game canonical and the direct narrative sequel made by mostly the same people directly afterwards non canonical is fascinating to think about

Breath of the Wild takes place in the Ocarina of Time timeline, Tears of the Kingdom takes place in the Majora's Mask timeline, Age of Calamity takes place in the OoT Master Quest timeline, I don't see what's so complicated about all of this

There was an article about the announcement of Echoes of Wisdom this year and their first question was “but where does this fit in the timeline? we’ll update if Nintendo gets back to us” and I can’t imagine my brain being so rotten that that’s my first thought about a Zelda game.

(My one actual timeline opinion is that putting Link’s Awakening before the Oracles is a very funny troll on Nintendo’s part)

if i think about the "timeline" for more than six seconds i immediately arrive at "magical kingdom that persists for thousands of years without ever inventing plumbing" and then i just want to lie down

The worst part is that putting BotW as their own thing is exactly what Zelda was supposed to be in the first place. I'm sure in 15 years they'll release a new full timeline including those too when they want to sell more books.