Luisf

@Loosf

Hi hello. Agender faggot.

They/It/He

Weird furry.
RaccoonRobot
Spicy alt: @LoosfButHornt

Luisf @Loosf7/5/2023, 2:56 PM

God's Silliest Billy @Rewhan

Damien @eramdam7/5/2023, 2:34 PM

Even after killing Better TweetDeck, I still receive solicitations from randos trying to "buy" the project. Incredibly the last one wants to run it as a "web3 project". Takes the crown in terms of "do not understand what they're seeing", for sure.

I'm used to getting emails about selling BTD (urgh) or even monetizing it with "search" (https://dotproto.com/2023/06/06/a-warning-about.html) but this one made my afternoon lol

Takel @takelgryph7/5/2023, 2:47 PM

it's amazing how often "web3" translates into "i have no fucking clue how anything about computers works"

#well less amazing and more completely unsurprising

You must log in to comment.

in reply to @eramdam's post:

Kran'ts Ton @sudo-EatPant7/5/2023, 2:38 PM

type of capitalist that just sees a recognizable name and wants to slap it on something else, regardless of whether its similar in anyway

Cosmic Rabbit @paperlanty7/5/2023, 3:02 PM

truly mystified by this mindset they have, although maybe not since the intention is probably moreso getting unwitting users' attention by buying it

Remi Erin Autor the remeranAuthor @remeranAuthor7/5/2023, 3:13 PM

It's... A browser extension... Doesn't that make it effectively open source by its very nature? It's not like you own the tweet deck brand. So silly.

@magic-spell7/5/2023, 6:17 PM

You would think they wouldn't just straight up come to you and say that they want buy it to put a crypto miner in it.

in reply to @takelgryph's post:

Gaffy @gaffyishere7/5/2023, 3:00 PM

i love how they dont even call it "better tweetdeck", but "betterdeck"

@Luarvik7/5/2023, 5:11 PM

Take their money and tell them that they have a year to have a product in stores or they lose permission and have to pay you again. Anyone using the term web3 in earnest at this point is, imho, volunteering to be rooked for everything they're worth.