MagicScarf

Subject to change (in a tf way)

  • he/she/they

Refractive Geode
Plural, kinky asexual, >21, offshoot of @SnepGem
We’re a system of 50+ gender-fluid furries obsessed with transformation, clothing, costumes, gender, magic, and the ways they interact.
Most of us are humans, and we all seem to change back to our “default forms” over time, even recovering from transformations that would otherwise be permanent.
The doors to the Nonsense-Castle, our headspace, are always open to visitors, so feel free to swing by via our ask box! Transform a headmate, or strike up a conversation, or present some cool magical item or idea, or start an entire Plot Arc, or whatever!


iamarat
@iamarat

Important bulletin to all personnel:

As of 2024/07/11, the Foundation will no longer classifying yinglets as anomalies. Despite our best efforts, they have multiplied enough that we have no choice but to consider them a part of consensus reality. Yinglets and their natural reproduction cycle will receive an -EX classification.

Please be aware that this does not mean that SCP-ZHZH is to be declassified. Yinglet reproduction through transformation is still considered a Keter anomaly, and all instances of SCP-ZHZH are to be taken into Foundation custody immediately upon discovery.

Agents already affected by SCP-ZHZH are to be embedded in as many yinglet communities as possible, prioritizing larger ones, to secure instances of SCP-ZHZH (both to ensure yinglets remain a non-anomalous species and for Foundation study and use).

Yinglet personnel within the Foundation are to retain their current positions; per the Ethics Committee, those affected by SCP-ZHZH are to receive full accommodations as disabled personnel (particularly in re: size reduction). On-site sleeping and exercise accommodations are to be provided (cf. document SCP-ZHZH/HBTRL).

Also per Ethics Committee, under no circumstances is SCP-ZHZH to be employed on particularly effective personnel to increase their number of available working hours. We've all seen what happened to Dr. W⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛.

Postscript:
No, we are not testing SCP-ZHZH on 682. We cannot run the risk that it might work.


You must log in to comment.