As someone who intensely struggled in higher education with art and design because my lecturers believed using digital tools was somehow less 'hands-on' than physical shit, yeah, I really don't want people going there with this.
Visual neural nets have provided me with interesting tools to get inspiration and ideas that would be harder to accomplish with basic image searches. They've helped disabled people create visual works.
Capital is as capital does, but let us not make wide sweeping generalisations about a tool that under the right stewardship, is quite benign and actually can offer quite a lot in reducing toil and repetition in artistic labour.
We are all cyborgs - we use tools to enhance our abilities and mediate with the outside world and others.
In my opinion, there is no good answer to 'how much tools do you use to create artwork for it to be considered valid'.
