Writer, twitch streamer, extremely good product photos enthusiast & operator of at least these, probably more:

@ExtremelyGoodProductPhotos
@ioquake3


Mr. Nuclear Monster Twitch
www.twitch.tv/mrnuclearmonster

InterurbanEra
@InterurbanEra
kda
@kda asked:

What's your favourite "modern" (post-"rails to rubber", so on) public transit rolling stock, and why?

Bonus question: what's your least favourite?

I'm going to limit this just to equipment I've actually ridden. There's plenty that I could criticize on aesthetic principle, and one that I could certainly criticize mechanically.

Siemens s200 built for Muni
I found these to be a vast improvement over the breda cars that succeeded the lovable looking, yet mechanically terrible Boeing LRVs. The seating in the s200s is much more comfortable, they are quiet, they operate extremely well. Also, I was very pleased they went with the paint scheme that I chose in a citywide poll they did before these were delivered years ago. I think they fit San Francisco very well and I look forward to riding them every time I'm in town.

KS SLRV
I was deeply impressed with Dallas's system, and these cars really shone well zooming around town in the intense heat while the air conditioning kept the car is icy cool. They also ride extremely well, and accelerate smoothly. I really found them to be far above what I was expecting for a light rail vehicle in this region. I hope fellow people who live in Dallas admire them like I do.

Translohr "Gadgetbahn"
The nation of France has been gripped by the Michelin monopoly for well over a century, and this is deeply affected all of its railroad infrastructure. France's insistence that rubber tired trains are a good idea because Michelin bribed them into thinking so has produced a wide variety of issues. Not least of which is the immense amount of microplastics which could have been completely avoided, if they hadn't used rubber tires on trains in the first place. It may provide a somewhat smoother ride, but of the expense of much more maintenance. This type of system is even more ridiculous with a monorail countersunk into the street that a bus type vehicle blindly follows. It is both more complex than a bus and less useful than a tram. Also a technological orphan, which means it will be very hard to keep going after the technology has flopped. Streetcars have a disproportionately long life compared to buses because of their mechanical simplicity, and this actively works against it. It's the most absurd, useless, corrupt, and patently dumb "innovation" to misguide city planners into wasting money on it versus tried and true methods.

What are some of your favorite light rail vehicles? Let me know in the comments.


You must log in to comment.

in reply to @InterurbanEra's post:

The SLRVs are serviceable, I'd say. Seats are only mid height and it can be really hard for people with a movement disability to reach the one door in each car that doesn't require stepping up, but the aircons indeed work well and the cars are very speedy outside of the city core, the core of which they drive at streetcar speed.

The problem with DART is that outside the city core, it's almost all park and rides or otherwise walk-heavy destinations. Least it's not Texrail, which despite having far superior cars (Stadler FLIRTs my beloved), operates with a schedule twice as slow and with a single line that has just as shitty destinations.

Pinned Tags