• They/Them

Trite, contrived, mediocre, milquetoast, amateurish, infantile, cliche-and-gonorrhea-ridden paean to conformism, eye-fucked me, affront to humanity, war crime, should literally be tried for war crimes, resolutely shit, lacking in imagination, uninformed reimagining of, limp-wristed, premature, ill-informed attempt at, talentless fuckfest, recidivistic shitpeddler, pedantic, listless, savagely boring, just one repulsive laugh after another.


My homepage
mxsd.ca/
Telegram
@Mx_Self_Destruct
Signal
MxSelfDestruct.42
Soulseek
MxSelfDestruct
You must log in to comment.

in reply to @MxSelfDestruct's post:

It seems to me you have to be OK with a certain level of deviation from your personal perfect tagging schema if you're going to fully rely on automation. In the past when I engaged in tagging (I haven't had the spoons for well over 5 years) I could only use the automated data as a timesaver at the start before doing laborious manual edits.

I'm sure some people are less picky about the end result or are lucky enough that their ideal tagging system aligns perfectly with the results of one or the other automated method. Not me though.

Besides exhaustion and the ever-increasing workload (and despite how nice it'd be to have my stuff properly tagged) another reason I haven't returned to tagging yet is it increasingly strikes me as a non-ideal use of my limited time in this life. 😔 NOT TO GET TOO HEAVY BUT

I've never used beets. Is it good at all with more obscure stuff? My biggest fear is having it undo all my hard work because some chucklefuck made a mistake in the tags and nobody ever caught it because the artist in question isn't even popular in their home country.

I’ma giant normie so I have no idea lol. You should look up on musicbrainz some of your obscure music to see. You can also use the “timid” flag and have it ask before tagging every single album.