• They/Them

Trite, contrived, mediocre, milquetoast, amateurish, infantile, cliche-and-gonorrhea-ridden paean to conformism, eye-fucked me, affront to humanity, war crime, should literally be tried for war crimes, resolutely shit, lacking in imagination, uninformed reimagining of, limp-wristed, premature, ill-informed attempt at, talentless fuckfest, recidivistic shitpeddler, pedantic, listless, savagely boring, just one repulsive laugh after another.


My homepage
mxsd.ca/
Telegram
@Mx_Self_Destruct
Signal
MxSelfDestruct.42
Soulseek
MxSelfDestruct

Codarobo
@Codarobo
Sorry! This post has been deleted by its original author.

Codarobo
@Codarobo

Edit: (Im removing this screenshot of a post I found frustrating because it doesn’t feel good to be putting someone on blast. I think all this is hitting a misinformation trigger for me and I’m willing to yell into the void to get through it but i should leave other people out of it. Sorry)


Codarobo
@Codarobo

Ok I have to tell you how I saw a “doesn’t have an algorithm” post, highly shared, by a popular furry poster, which had a reply from someone who was like “why am i seeing your post then, I don’t follow you” and got a response of “well, bluesky shows you posts that people you follow have replied to” and, friends, i was looking in the fucking office camera in that moment

This is why this is making me feel insane


eramdam
@eramdam
Sorry! This post has been deleted by its original author.


You must log in to comment.

in reply to @Codarobo's post:

…bluesky’s (current) entire identity is that it’s all algorithmic!!! Algorithmic feeds, automated NSFW/hate group mention/violence/spam tagging, automated moderation, etc.

Until they finally follow through on their promises to make it all decentralized, those are the only vaguely unique traits among Twitter replacements they’ve tried to push!

in reply to @Codarobo's post:

in reply to @Codarobo's post:

no, no, it doesn't have an algorithm. it just has a set of rules it follows in order to decide which content to show you, sometimes including content from people you don't even follow. totally different

In the sense that bluesky is chronological, so was Twitter until I left it a few months ago. Idk how bad things have gotten but i would never have described Twitter, even in the worst times, as “non chronological”. That’s one of its defining traits!

Oh wait, are we talking about the optional for you/discover/etc feeds? Which -both of these sites have-, separate from the ‘following’ feed? I still don’t understand then.

The biggest difference I can understand here is that Twitter does more, particularly post Elon takeover, to encourage you to use the for you feed, but the whole “chrono following feed” and “non chrono selective algo feed” thing exists on both sites.

in reply to @eramdam's post:

Mastodon but the moderation tasks falls onto the user who has to "choose a moderation provider" in a "marketplace" (their words, not mine), so IMO it's Worse Mastodon. The instance drama sucks (ive been there since 2017 so ive seen my fair share) but being told "oh you don't want to see nazis? just mute them!" is more insulting to me.

OH and I guess it's Mastodon But Built By Venture Capital which IMO is worse as well but it's clearly not a deal breaker to everybody. I'm there just because a few friends only moved there but I will be complaining the whole time.