proposed solution: Macro USB-C. it's like USB-C but the size of a type A port. no other changes.
- They/Them
Trite, contrived, mediocre, milquetoast, amateurish, infantile, cliche-and-gonorrhea-ridden paean to conformism, eye-fucked me, affront to humanity, war crime, should literally be tried for war crimes, resolutely shit, lacking in imagination, uninformed reimagining of, limp-wristed, premature, ill-informed attempt at, talentless fuckfest, recidivistic shitpeddler, pedantic, listless, savagely boring, just one repulsive laugh after another.
My homepage
mxsd.ca/Telegram
@Mx_Self_Destruct
Signal
MxSelfDestruct.42
Soulseek
MxSelfDestruct
You must log in to comment.
in reply to @MxSelfDestruct's post:
Personally, I think we should just quietly pretend USB-C and gigabit Ethernet are the same standard, then standardize on M12 X-code connectors. That'll show 'em. If we must stick with the 24-pin physical layer, then I want DB-25 shells on everything.
i only have usb c on exactly one device i use but to me it feels looser than the microusb port on my phone. i feel like the issue is more that it's just built too loose, not the size of it
maybe my usb c port is just bad