ngl this V shit looks pretty promising. a low-level programming language that encourages safety without throwing everything else under the bus for it?1 With standard GUI libraries? And interop with C? yeah, I can dig.
-
(glares at rust)
- They/Them
Trite, contrived, mediocre, milquetoast, amateurish, infantile, cliche-and-gonorrhea-ridden paean to conformism, eye-fucked me, affront to humanity, war crime, should literally be tried for war crimes, resolutely shit, lacking in imagination, uninformed reimagining of, limp-wristed, premature, ill-informed attempt at, talentless fuckfest, recidivistic shitpeddler, pedantic, listless, savagely boring, just one repulsive laugh after another.
My homepage
mxsd.ca/Telegram
@Mx_Self_Destruct
Signal
MxSelfDestruct.42
Soulseek
MxSelfDestruct
You must log in to comment.
in reply to @MxSelfDestruct's post:
the only thing i know about v is that they were way way way overpromising stuff years ago. i wonder if it's actually a cool language now.
OH WOW IT HAS DECLARATIVE UI ok i might have to try it. trying to do declarative ui with zig has so many issues
- kind of funny with the edge case they had to work around with the implicit struct named param syntax thing
- a bit weird how or blocks have the implicit name
- seems like lots of things are special cased in the compiler right now which is cool for those things but requires editing the compiler to make your own
Operator overloading goes against V's philosophy of simplicity and predictability. But since scientific and graphical applications are among V's domains, operator overloading is an important feature to have in order to improve readability
heh. that feels like it's directly mirroring what zig says
- the build system seems to not require a configuration file, instead the config is in the source code. this seems like it could be pretty cool if done well
it seems pretty cool. i might try it