NireBryce

reality is the battlefield

the first line goes in Cohost embeds

🐥 I am not embroiled in any legal battle
🐦 other than battles that are legal 🎮

I speak to the universe and it speaks back, in it's own way.

mastodon

email: contact at breadthcharge dot net

I live on the northeast coast of the US.

'non-functional programmer'. 'far left'.

conceptual midwife.

https://cohost.org/NireBryce/post/4929459-here-s-my-five-minut

If you can see the "show contact info" dropdown below, I follow you. If you want me to, ask and I'll think about it.


literalHam
@literalHam

nuclear hot take: cutting edge hardware and software developers are in a reverse arms-race that literally no one else on the planet cares about except other people who work in tech. no one cares that the S23 can support a framerate 1 sextillionth of a percent faster than the S22, or that the newest version of android....i cant even think of a fake reason to give a shit about an android update for its own sake. software "improvement" justifies the need for hardware "improvement" to keep up, and the promise of hardware "improvement" justifies the need for software "improvement", because they can, and i guess no one who works in tech has ever seen Jurrasic Park. Nobody else on the planet wants this, but it keeps a few thousand people employed and extremely well-paid, and makes a handful of people obscenely wealthy. and they are so well-siloed in their little tech enclaves that they dont realize that their entire jobs are pointlessly making the world worse and more expensive for everyone else. or how much the rest of the world hates them


shel
@shel

Video game graphics never needed to get better than the PS3. Phones were doing fine in 2015. The focus needs to shift on how to maintain the same standards with increasingly affordable and sustainable products not continuing to make everything more power guzzling and expensive to produce to make it more powerful.


lupi
@lupi
Lupi14:16
we didn't need to keep making computers "better" after like 200whatever has the online experience changed any since the age of the core 2 duo i'd argue no, and in the cases where it has, like every piece of software (discord included) being a shitty bloated electron app, that was only allowed to happen because the continued forced evolution of computing hardware allowed software developers to get reckless and lazy with what they percieved as fucntionally infinite availabilty of coputational resources or video games getting "better" graphics that don't really like. actually look all that better? the games that were made back then don't all look worse unless they chased photorealism

ETPC
@ETPC

before the DNF leak and back when i was bugging 3DR developers because i wanted to pitch an article to someone, i had the lead level designer for DNF (Charlie Weiderhold) tell me that the joy of the late 90's/early 00's was the approximation of reality and that's an idea that has stayed with me since. stylized realities will always look better then grey and brown 'photoreal' bullshit


NireBryce
@NireBryce

I think a lot about how the majority of the people with the time to yell at game developers on twitter and reddit are like, younger than twenty.


You must log in to comment.

in reply to @literalHam's post:

no this is actually a flawless take

since 2015 i have not upgraded my graphics card because new stuff looks better and i want that. no, i've done it because the new stuff is more demanding and technically looks better in nigh-imperceptible ways, and i need something capable of handling that

i'm still on android 10 on my phone because i look at the patch notes up to 13 and go "but i dont want that. thats not better." i still use a phone from 2017, despite it literally physically falling apart - seriously, the screen moves around now, the glue holding it in place has started to decay - because nothing released since is actually any better than my old oneplus 5

i dont care about "better" anymore! stop! give me that same tech but for 50 bucks instead of 500!! stop giving me things that really only look better on benchmark scores, but have no impact on my life, that cost 1500 bucks instead!!

in reply to @shel's post:

I'm a 3d artist and I couldn't agree more.

Granted, a lot of the reason art looks good from earlier eras was careful and deliberate design that takes additional work - the hours saved from not needing to teeter into photorealism with a km render distance would be unreal.

Too often 'graphics' gets boiled down to how realistic or high resolution something is rather than art direction and stylistic choice.

A great example is Metroid Prime. The game is almost 20 years old, yet still looks pretty because how great the art direction was. Sure, a remaster of a 20 year old game looks better, but the step up is really not so significant that it improves the game

in reply to @ETPC's post:

I don’t usually post but respectfully I think this is pretty silly. There are so many issues with the tech industry but incremental improvements in processing power and efficiency (much of which is driven by contributions to open standards and free software at the lower levels of the tech stack) aren’t it.

in reply to @NireBryce's post: