NireBryce

reality is the battlefield

the first line goes in Cohost embeds

🐄 I am not embroiled in any legal battle
🐦 other than battles that are legal šŸŽ®

I speak to the universe and it speaks back, in it's own way.

mastodon

email: contact at breadthcharge dot net

I live on the northeast coast of the US.

'non-functional programmer'. 'far left'.

conceptual midwife.

https://cohost.org/NireBryce/post/4929459-here-s-my-five-minut

If you can see the "show contact info" dropdown below, I follow you. If you want me to, ask and I'll think about it.


NireBryce
@NireBryce

As of September 30, 2022, PMI’s smoke-free products are available in 70 markets globally. Over 30 percent of our net revenue now comes from these innovative alternatives to cigarettes for those adult smokers who would otherwise continue to smoke. By 2025, we aim to be a majority smoke-free company.


NireBryce
@NireBryce

that old horse of mine, "we could reduce lung cancer if cigarette companies were not absolutely brainrotted"

Liggett Tobacco Group acknowledged that solvents used to wash the tobacco leaves also caused ā€œremoval of most of the aromatic flavorants which give tobacco its characteristic and desirable aroma.ā€ 43 Liggett’s assistant director of research concluded that washing the tobacco leaf was not commercially advantageous.44

(2006) Waking a Sleeping Giant: The Tobacco Industry’s Response to the Polonium-210 Issue

by Monique E. Muggli, MPH, Jon O. Ebbert, MD, Channing Robertson, PhD, and Richard D. Hurt, MD

ABSTRACT

The major tobacco manufacturers discovered that polonium was part of tobacco and tobacco smoke more than 40 years ago and attempted, but failed, to remove this radioactive substance from their products. Internal tobacco industry documents reveal that the companies suppressed publication of their own internal research to avoid heightening the public’s awareness of radioactivity in cigarettes. Tobacco companies continue to minimize their knowledge about polonium-210 in cigarettes in smoking and health litigation. Cigarette packs should carry a radiation-exposure warning label.


NireBryce
@NireBryce

I got a D- because this was, and I quote, "literally unbelievable". I was offered "cigarettes bad" as a topic because i couldn't think of one and they were exasperated at my inability to choose. so i went way too hard on it

this was probably four to six years before that paper came out, but there were quite a few people working on it. I had collected abstracts but didn't have journal access when i was like 14 or whatever. from like, reputable medical journals. I phone interviewed two ENTs.

but "oh so you're now saying everyone's just SMONKING POLONIUM huh". it was literally unbelievable to middle/highschool teachers in the 2000 era

anyway this topic is lodged in the back of my mind because of that


You must log in to comment.

in reply to @NireBryce's post:

oh heavens no! they're in the solutions industry now.

As of September 30, 2022, PMI’s smoke-free products are available in 70 markets globally. Over 30 percent of our net revenue now comes from these innovative alternatives to cigarettes for those adult smokers who would otherwise continue to smoke. By 2025, we aim to be a majority smoke-free company.

in reply to @NireBryce's post:

in reply to @NireBryce's post:

(this isn't an insult, just, a way to read the web in case it helps) that's a nbci.nlm.nih.gov/pmc (pubmed) link hosting an article from the American Journal of Public Health.

though i did selectively quote the top quote. but imo in light of the evidence it wasn't worth leaving the PR in.

that's not to say it's a perfect paper, there's more recent ones that I probably haven't looked for (though i do have another lying around somewhere)