NireBryce

reality is the battlefield

the first line goes in Cohost embeds

🐥 I am not embroiled in any legal battle
🐦 other than battles that are legal 🎮

I speak to the universe and it speaks back, in it's own way.

mastodon

email: contact at breadthcharge dot net

I live on the northeast coast of the US.

'non-functional programmer'. 'far left'.

conceptual midwife.

https://cohost.org/NireBryce/post/4929459-here-s-my-five-minut

If you can see the "show contact info" dropdown below, I follow you. If you want me to, ask and I'll think about it.


daddragon
@daddragon

Fine texture

I got this roll of probably late 90s expired gold 800 at blue moon and sat on it for a while. I threw it in the camera and went wandering around, shooting whatever, and then developed it myself1. I shot it mostly at 200, but the negs after development were just barely there. Like, hardly differentiated from the stock. Kinda thought it was a lost cause, so they've been just sitting for a little bit.

I'm still trying to figure out color editing, but I just had the scanner set up for another roll and figured I'd give these a try, see if I can get anything out of them. And uh. Well.

I think they could have used more exposure - maybe 100, maybe 50 - but actually the colors are surprisingly good. I only had to do a bit of tuning in (prerelease) RawTherapee's film negative tool.

Kind of surprised there's so much damage to the emulsion, but it's not so bad. The weird edge-lighting, I'm not sure what that's about. Maybe the light splashed around in scanning? The film was so... dry and thin and unruly when I was loading it, and its pretty cupped still.


  1. in a class, the instructor had a cinestill kit


You must log in to comment.

in reply to @daddragon's post:

Impossible To Say.

I kind of figured it'd be shittier given how a roll of 80s kodacolor VR behaved, but like, there's not really that much color shift (in the shots that were okay). The dynamic range is shittier but like the colors are wild.