shot in the dark but on Linux is there the possibility for the... opposite of symlinks? a "directory" that's just a list of pointers to other files, instead of a directory full of symlinks. yes i could just do that but that's not the point

the first line goes in Cohost embeds
🐥 I am not embroiled in any legal battle
🐦 other than battles that are legal 🎮
I speak to the universe and it speaks back, in it's own way.
mastodon
email: contact at breadthcharge dot net
I live on the northeast coast of the US.
'non-functional programmer'. 'far left'.
conceptual midwife.
https://cohost.org/NireBryce/post/4929459-here-s-my-five-minut
If you can see the "show contact info" dropdown below, I follow you. If you want me to, ask and I'll think about it.
shot in the dark but on Linux is there the possibility for the... opposite of symlinks? a "directory" that's just a list of pointers to other files, instead of a directory full of symlinks. yes i could just do that but that's not the point
There is not, no, directories are inherently tangible things (which has to do with how dirs and direntries are represented internally) (and also semantically a bit I guess, directories are lists of mappings of names to other things)