(if you're red green colorblind I have good news and bad news. The good news is black is the color of original content, not green. The bad news is you probably thought there was more original content than there is)
via
reality is the battlefield
- she/they (pl)
- breadthcharge.net/
the first line goes in Cohost embeds
🐥 I am not embroiled in any legal battle
🐦 other than battles that are legal 🎮
I speak to the universe and it speaks back, in it's own way.
mastodon
email: contact at breadthcharge dot net
I live on the northeast coast of the US.
'non-functional programmer'. 'far left'.
conceptual midwife.
https://cohost.org/NireBryce/post/4929459-here-s-my-five-minut
If you can see the "show contact info" dropdown below, I follow you. If you want me to, ask and I'll think about it.
You must log in to comment.
in reply to @NireBryce's post:
I'm red/green colour-blind so this all looks above board to me!
(100 examples? dang, this will be fun)
it's red/black FWIW. there is not much black. red is verbatim copy
Yeah I can tell if I concentrate - my colour-blindness actually exhibits more in not being able to tell red from black than from green, despite the name, which is hell when people are trying to be fancy with it
I have to wonder how many of the differences are NYT editing their own article after publication (which they do all the time, as tracked by the “Editing the Gray Lady” Twitter account).
In the first few examples, I saw one difference that looked clearly to me like the text generator went off-script briefly, and one other that was expressly labeled an NYT update (in square brackets and the first word was “Update:”). A lot of the other differences look like mundane copy-edits.