Tools needs co-editors to continue along established lines. Comment if you are interested; please tell us a little about what makes a good tool.

the first line goes in Cohost embeds
🐥 I am not embroiled in any legal battle
🐦 other than battles that are legal 🎮
I speak to the universe and it speaks back, in it's own way.
mastodon
email: contact at breadthcharge dot net
I live on the northeast coast of the US.
'non-functional programmer'. 'far left'.
conceptual midwife.
https://cohost.org/NireBryce/post/4929459-here-s-my-five-minut
If you can see the "show contact info" dropdown below, I follow you. If you want me to, ask and I'll think about it.
Tools needs co-editors to continue along established lines. Comment if you are interested; please tell us a little about what makes a good tool.
i'd be interested.
a good tool is effective and reliable. a good tool does one thing well. flashy "tools" not only let down their users, they are a waste of space and time at their core. they are fundamentally unethical.
a bad tool in my opinion is 8mb.video: why is this a website with JS and CSS when it could be a 500 byte bash script that depends on ffmpeg.
a good tool in my opinion is Rufus: the design is something anyone could make in winforms, but i've never managed to throw an ISO at it that it couldn't handle and make bootable. it is perhaps the epitome of function over design