NireBryce

reality is the battlefield

the first line goes in Cohost embeds

🐥 I am not embroiled in any legal battle
🐦 other than battles that are legal 🎮

I speak to the universe and it speaks back, in it's own way.

mastodon

email: contact at breadthcharge dot net

I live on the northeast coast of the US.

'non-functional programmer'. 'far left'.

conceptual midwife.

https://cohost.org/NireBryce/post/4929459-here-s-my-five-minut

If you can see the "show contact info" dropdown below, I follow you. If you want me to, ask and I'll think about it.


and yeah it's true, and I'm sure some of them don't know. But doing that is a learned skill, and a very hard one to master. It's a big reason Science Communication and Technical Writing are seen as cornerstones in their fields and industries.

Okay, so... when people say "write for a high school audience" when they give writing/speaking advice, they kinda don't mean a high school reading level imo

(though, with the literacy rates, it couldn't hurt)

instead, imo the core advice is closer to "outside of whatever they specialized into or sought out intentionally after, people's base facts are learned in highschool, and only made accurate through exposure to information they think is from reputable sources"

or put another way, the further away something is from someone's job or their hobby/activism/etc area of interest, most people's understanding of a thing will be what they were taught in high school. Anything past that takes building up to, if you want to be able to assume the majority of your readers will understand what you're saying.

The flip side of this is that the more you know about something, the harder it is to remember what you needed to know when you were in the position of someone not-even-learning. The Curse of Knowledge.

that's why it's good to keep all this in mind. If you're thinking about it as you're going along, it's easier to know where you need to start and what needs to be broken down vs just discarded, etc.


there's a scene in Star Trek Discovery. Everyone's suffocating, low oxygen. bridge crew, security, etc turns into thembos due to hypoxia preventing them from forming composite thoughts. engineering devolves into technobabble because hypoxia has removed their ability to break the concepts they work with at a base level into smaller pieces. while i don't think it actually works that was, it's a useful metaphor: when you're in deep, you use jargon as compression -- multiple paragraphs into single words, or concepts, laws, patterns. but that's built up from years of learning it, even if you don't think of it as learning, per se.

if you can master both sides of that you will excel in most fields


You must log in to comment.

in reply to @NireBryce's post:

RE: the curse of knowledge, I'm trying to put together a pitch for something that I'm intimately familiar with and I feel like I'm slamming into a brick wall because of this

For what it's worth, I find it helpful to use an outline to break it down over and over at each level into extreme granularity.

Having it in an outline / flowchart view really helps me figure out where I can combine things or remove duplicate sections, helping me still keep the word count low, but yeah it is extra overhead.

that said, I'm not a technical writer, just someone who did grassroots political work. So there's probably better strats out there.

Been thinking about this whenever I write my marine science posts - the xkcd comic about overestimation of general knowledge is alive and well, I got surprised once by a friend not realizing that "benthic" was an ocean science term and not an invented word for Magic the Gathering. I like to think I've struck a good balance but honestly it's hard to tell sometimes. I just write stuff and hope people will ask clarifying questions.