NireBryce

reality is the battlefield

the first line goes in Cohost embeds

๐Ÿฅ I am not embroiled in any legal battle
๐Ÿฆ other than battles that are legal ๐ŸŽฎ

I speak to the universe and it speaks back, in it's own way.

mastodon

email: contact at breadthcharge dot net

I live on the northeast coast of the US.

'non-functional programmer'. 'far left'.

conceptual midwife.

https://cohost.org/NireBryce/post/4929459-here-s-my-five-minut

If you can see the "show contact info" dropdown below, I follow you. If you want me to, ask and I'll think about it.


and it just keeps getting faster and people keep getting more and more... entitled? accustomed? to things happening fast in ways that make them impossible to satisfy without big investment or a big company.

the more the Rando Gestalt, including you probably for some things, including me for many things, think the current state is normal and smaller groups should match or be below the price of companies that have way more ways to pay the bills for development and labor, the more impossible it becomes to run anything outside of the big companies or the ones in someone's pocket.

"buy local" somehow got spun into the environmental cost of truck transit and not if you don't buy from those places, even if they're more expensive, they'll die. and then the Super Amamart or whatever products will go up in price to match the now dead niche instead of continuing the undercutting.

same goes for niche computer utilities, or websites, or open source projects you should probably kick 15$ to if you use them daily even if you hate their documentation (I wonder why it's so sparse, they're making 27$ a month off it ๐Ÿ™„).

The more features you push hard for that something should have that it doesn't yet, the more speed you think they should be caused at, the more you're looking for companies valued over one hundred million dollars. That's how they get that change density, that's how they can hire enough engineers to parallel-specialize, etc.


You must log in to comment.

in reply to @NireBryce's post:

I like and agree with this in general, but I do also fear that "buy local" in practice is about 50/50 between supporting a sustainable and ethical local supply chain and supporting your local petit bourgeois shithead as they resell you crap from the global supply chain or unfit-for-purpose goods at mark-up. Craft marketplaces are full of this -- anywhere you have cheap booths and a crowd, "jewelers" selling the same diecast zinc AliExpress charms seem to come out of the woodwork spontaneously. At least where I live, a non-trivial part of the locally-grown food is frankly borderline unsafe because it was grown by someone who decided to go run a farm at a loss because they enjoy the aesthetic and they had enough money to get away with it. For example, the unpasteurized milk people, who kill a couple of their patrons every few years in the states but are so cloaked in feel-good crunchy natural foods vibes that they persistently escape prosecution and are even getting legalized

right, buy local got morphed by the ease of dropshipping, but before it was recuperated for that, it was because even buying from the local petit bourgeois big-small-business tyrant was still better than amazon for things when you consider municipal/state taxes that were extracted by no longer needing retail locations. So the intentions were, largely sound until it didn't matter, and then it became a marketing slogan for only the rich. Could they have gone further? Dunno, it was the 90s and 2000s in the US. Probably not.

and like you'll hear this remark made in right-wing circles sometimes, like, "we need another war to spur innovation"

really? you want more government spending on R&D? you want private companies told what they are allowed to work on and what they aren't?

you still wouldn't get what you want if you had that (and there is already a lot of military R&D spending today), because what actually gave the US that economic advantage was that factories on other continents got bombed and factories in North America did not

i don't agree with the US economic advantage being because of that. I can write more on this if you want later but it's long.

[ edit for context: lend-lease ended up giving away at deep discount or free a lot of non military goods, that was the major US production contribution until the latter half. ]

I think even if the factories were standing, the US would have been massively ahead, because the US had a lot of resources it "secured", and then was suddenly thrust into a liminal space where it was a totalitarian planned economy for production and a capitalist democracy for politics, one where it could take out massive treasury loans and pour them into scaling up production because the alternative wouldn't be moral or strategically advantageous.

but everyone was okay with it that time because along with that, it was going "to bring our boys home from the war."

none of the patriots seem to know their history, not that that's a surprise. massive gov investment was the engine of the "golden age"

you don't need a war to do that. not that the US deserves to have another golden age, mind

but the key thing was just the political will to metaphorically print money