I like writing and writing byproducts
πŸ§‰πŸ’œβœ¨πŸŒΉ


NoelBWrites
@NoelBWrites

In 1776 Adam Smith invented economics. He talked about the invisible hand of the market, self interest being good and how growth is what actually matters. This is not challenged at all so I guess he was right.

Thomas Malthus finally shows up, after all that foreshadowing. He was also right about everything.

Karl Marx existed but we sadly don't have any records of his thoughts because he never wrote or said anything, apparently.

Now something like "The Great Depression" sounds like a bummer but turns out that's just the name of the year economists started caring about economic growth.

With the launching of World War II industry mobilized [...] demonstrating that an economy could still grow and could grow quickly. By the end of the war industrial production was vigorous and scientists and engineers were launching one discovery or invention after an other.

(Is it me or the tone here makes this sound like a weird marketing pitch for World War II? "New and improved, now with Nazi scientists!")

Anyway what matters is that because of all the cool tech that was the only consequence of the war, air conditioning was invented and suburbs materialized into existence. Economists had to adapt economic theory to fit this new reality but whatever they came up with is a secret, I think.

I love learning from my dear friend Margaret Robertson who never omits any important information or context.


NoelBWrites
@NoelBWrites

I realize that it may sound petty of me to pick on this book for going "WWII happened and because of it industry developed a lot, let's move on". After all, this isn't a history book. And the relevant thing here is how the "economic growth model" developed and brought us where we are today.

except

The fact that white Americans could now ride lawnmowers over their own turf grass is not what fucking changed the world economic landscape after WWII, is it?

The fucking Marshall Plan?
The cold war?
The red scare that lead to a bunch of fucked up shit in the name of fighting communism, including but not limited to a bunch of coups in Latin America, the blockade in Cuba and the fucking Vietnam war??

Those may have had something to do with which countries are "richer" than others??? Also they may help explain how suddenly there were new markets for US consumer goods and therefore the possibility of even more economic growth??? Bitch????


You must log in to comment.

in reply to @NoelBWrites's post:

I think the ultimate conclusion is "(too much) economic growth is bad", but by golly we are committed to never examine the causes and ideology behind unfettered growth.

Also I'm guessing Ms. Robertson's views are closer to "humans are the real plague" than "capitalism, yay!"

One thing that my history teacher used to say that gets me enraged, is that "war is necessary to develop new technologies".
No it isn't??? Also fuck you?????
I don't have source nor evidence that back ups my claim, but every centimeter of my body screams that that's just wrong.

We just need more autistic people with resources to make stuff. /hj

in reply to @NoelBWrites's post: