Noxulous

Bloodthirsty non-human creature.

  • it/its they/them (collectively)

I am an open book to the inquisitive, im reasonable and will answer any question, regardless of how forward or strange. Im a non-human non-person eldritch entity with strange values, strange priorities, and strange interests. I respond to Nox.

I like to write alot, if you like it and want to tip me anything you can send it via paypal.me/Noxulous

My discord is @noxulous do not be afraid to add and talk to me.

I am perpetually poor and would like to commission a thing that's been eating my mind for years.

We are Noxulous, Dark Algorithm, Evil and Sanguinarium Vitae Seraph of the indominable (all it/its)

@Evil-and-its-musings is where Evil tries to form a grand unified theory on what evil exactly is, separate from morality. Its a strange entity, you might like it.

30 year old nonhuman, masculine nullgender, tentatively bi with a heavy female/femme lean. Poly.

My Lexicon! https://icedrive.net/s/z3jg4SGS1aw9u6G48fYkw26bX8yQ

Aethy

Interact with me? Yes, I luv it


ChrisNSFW
@ChrisNSFW
This post contains 18+ content. You can view it if you're over 18.
log in

DieselBrain
@DieselBrain

Erotica/porn is trying to get across the FEELING of sex. the vibes, the fantasy, the emotions associated with it. You cant FEEL how tight a hole is on your dick through a picture, but you know what helps sell that sensation? Seeing a really big ass cock in a small hole. Or seeing a fucking BULGE from the cock in someone's torso.

so much of porn is about bridging the gap between an IRL act that uses all 5 senses, and media that can really only rely on sight and sound at most. Porn has to communicate SO MUCH with only 2 senses to work with, so yeah, no shit a lot of porn is full of "unrealistic" stuff.

porn is not meant to be a 1 to 1 simulation of actual sex. Even the most "tasteful", "realistic" porn is depicting a fantasy, an ideal. It's art! I wish people would just treat it as art!


squishfox
@squishfox
This post contains 18+ content. You can view it if you're over 18.
log in

Noxulous
@Noxulous

Also some if the characters actually do explode out if their clothes, its not just visual shorthand (in those cases)


You must log in to comment.

in reply to @DieselBrain's post:

God I feel this so bad, and frankly about any expectations of 'realism' in art. Its this wild NeilDegrasseTysation of humanity that makes the shallowest critiques either in hope of validation or to dunk on the creator.

Yes, his tits are huge, her cock would never fit, and their reproduction method makes no sense. Its also not real. Please go outside.

Yes, this, exactly! Like it's fantasy, it's the communication of an idea, it's art! why on earth would you assume the goal of all art is realism anyway! So many people just don't seem to understand the concept of fiction and it's always been so confusing to me

Coming back to this a second time I think?

Ever since I read this, I've looked at nsfw art a lot more differently and been able to enjoy stuff like hyper proportions better. There has been less self-nagging. Thanks Chris and Diesel fir this.

in reply to @squishfox's post:

i guess not quite the same thing, but i've also seen folks who got into sounding with absolutely no trouble whereas the common experience seems to be that it stings like hell. maybe there's just a genetic diceroll here, but it's not really known as an extant quirk because hardly anyone talks about it

Oh yah, sounding rules, imo.

People seriously underestimate the variety of preferences people have and over-generalize. It can be hard to get out of the "things are just one way" mindset, and I can't say I won't expect occasional naevité, but it would be super neat if the pearl-clutching went away.

What if I -want- to get turned into a broken condom by a dick the size of a tractor? What if I wanna see and read things that express that in the most toe-curling, euphoric, obscene, ridiculous ways??? "Oh no what about their insides" "oof her back" all of it's diet puritan bullshit and I'm very tired of it, I was tired of it 15 years ago even

"oof her back" is interesting because it... it doesn't feel like a sympathizing comment? it feels like someone just not liking hyper tits aesthetically, but wanting to frame their dislike as an objective problem so they have a solid excuse to post it

maybe i'm reading too much into three words though