Noxulous

Bloodthirsty non-human creature.

  • it/its they/them (collectively)

I am an open book to the inquisitive, im reasonable and will answer any question, regardless of how forward or strange. Im a non-human non-person eldritch entity with strange values, strange priorities, and strange interests. I respond to Nox.

I like to write alot, if you like it and want to tip me anything you can send it via paypal.me/Noxulous

My discord is @noxulous do not be afraid to add and talk to me.

I am perpetually poor and would like to commission a thing that's been eating my mind for years.

We are Noxulous, Dark Algorithm, Evil and Sanguinarium Vitae Seraph of the indominable (all it/its)

@Evil-and-its-musings is where Evil tries to form a grand unified theory on what evil exactly is, separate from morality. Its a strange entity, you might like it.

30 year old nonhuman, masculine nullgender, tentatively bi with a heavy female/femme lean. Poly.

My Lexicon! https://icedrive.net/s/z3jg4SGS1aw9u6G48fYkw26bX8yQ

Aethy

Interact with me? Yes, I luv it


pervocracy
@pervocracy

unfinished thought but there's a distinction between when you see someone's action as a decision they made, vs. when you see it as revealing their True Nature, which was inside them all along but the mask has slipped

and this is obviously a very unproductive basis for discussion

but the problem is, on Twitter/Reddit/etc., it's frequently true. there are shitloads of people on those sites concern trolling and misrepresenting their intentions to score points in whatever fucking game they're playing. if you've engaged in political discourse on those sites, you have had that moment where someone seemed like they kept misunderstanding you, but then you remembered to check the post history and oh you sneaky little fucker. now I'm embarrassed that I even tried.

this experience has not set us up well for having conversations with people who disagree in good faith.


diane
@diane
Sorry! This post has been deleted by its original author.

You must log in to comment.

in reply to @pervocracy's post:

I think this gets left out a lot on discussions of discourse and yeah, I don't blame people for distrusting others when there are a lot of dishonest people out there. I don't think there's a good way to solve it at scale; you just need to build communities where people have rapport with each other. Which is also why having reasonable disagreements on social media is almost impossible.

Bad faith discourse is Like That, yeah.

A big component of the attraction is that you can claim whatever narrative of someone's actions suits you best as their True Nature, and every piece of complicating information as bad-faith manipulation or gaslighting or whatever.