Osmose

Osmose

@Osmose

I make websites and chiptunes!

  • he/him

AKAs:
Lapsed Neurotypical
JavaScript's Strongest Warrior
Fake Podcast Host
Thotleader
Vertically Integrated Boyfriend
Your Fave's Mutual
Certified 5x Severals by the RIAA
Inconsistently Medicated
The Source That Views Back
Carnally Known
The Alternative

log inask
Homepage
osmose.ceo/
Mastodon
digipres.club/@Osmose
Bluesky
bsky.app/profile/osmose.bsky.social
Osmose
@Osmose
aune
@aune
ticky
@ticky

look I am not going to defend Telegram or its owners but tbh the ongoing chat network fragmentation makes me really sad. Telegram sucks, Discord is frustrating, Signal has never taken privacy seriously, Matrix is poorly quality-controlled, XMPP is not ready for the modern world, IRC is worse. what's left? not fucking much.

aune
@aune

the problem with trying to fix this is that it immediately leads to creating another standard, and since people are monsters want rich text and infinite picture storage forever.................

Osmose
@Osmose

Okay but real talk there's fragmentation because no one wants the same thing but everyone wants to only have to use one thing

Trust me when I say that what Cohost thinks Discord should be is extremely different from what r/discord users think Discord should be is extremely different from what Genshin Discord server members think Discord should be is extremely different from what Midjourney (curse them) users think Discord should be is...

But the one thing everyone wants is for all their friends to use the same thing as them.

Fragmentation is the optimal state. It is the best reality you can get while optimizing for all of these use cases. Individual fragments could be better in their own niche but that's about all you can hope for.

You must log in to comment.

in reply to @ticky's post:

Raptor
@Raptor

Signal has absolutely made some compromises to make it more user friendly, aiming for more of a herd immunity method than truly inviolable security. They did at least finally allow you to hide your phone number.

I will note, for most folks, the largest risk to security is still ultimately the same risk you run with any group, which is that of someone intentionally betraying trust.

One-on-one Signal conversations are pretty safe though, presuming the person in trustworthy. Not as safe as a conversation in the woods after going there on foot, without any electronics, in disguises swapped at multiple public places along the way.

But it's pretty secure assuming their phone shipped with hardware encryption and they're not running a desktop client.

login to reply
ticky
@ticky

I did not say security, it's specifically the phone number thing I am frustrated by. I don't want people adding me by username to then suddenly know my phone number. Two steps forward, one back.

login to reply

in reply to @Osmose's post:

Pinned Tags