Owlrooster

Hoot Hoot Gazooks

Any pronouns (bonus points for creativity).

Queer polymorph (ΘΔ) trying to make the most of internet time and enjoy life where it matters. Adult enough to do taxes.

My writing goes on my website; I'm here to enjoy what others make, pass along what I like, and occasionally leave a comment. Think of me as the creature in your closet giving you a thumbs-up out of the corner of your eye.


Profile picture credit
cohost.org/bachelorsoft

explorermoo
@explorermoo

In which I use this funny title to talk about transformation and its themes in art

Full Disclaimer: I’m not an art historian nor a psychiatrist. All I say is my own conjecture and opinion based on what I know and have experienced. If you are any of those, please drop a comment! I’d love to hear your thoughts on the matter!

I first read Franz Kafka’s “The Metamorphosis” back when I was 18. At the time I had just started to live on my own and had begun to feel more comfortable with a lot of things surrounding myself. Being a furry, being “gay” (oh you poor summer child), and in general a weirdo.

So I sit down and start browsing the web for “Books About Transformation”. It had always been a subject I enjoyed tremendously, ever since a kid the idea of a person turning into something else had lived rent-free in my brain. (I blame the Aladdin TV Show. There’s an episode where Jasmine gets turned into a snake and… listen that changed my brain chemistry when I was a little grub)

So I go and start looking for REAL literature written by REAL writers. It was a sort of way to try and validate my obsession with the thematic. No shade to all the furry artists whose work I’d enjoyed reading and looking… But to a silly young adult (moth) it didn’t feel like “real art”. Just, you know, kink material.

And so, oh boy oh boy, I find “The Metamorphosis” as presented with the blurb “Story about a man who finds himself turned into a large insect.”. Yeah THIS IS WHAT I WANT, LET’S GOOO


If anyone reading this has read “The Metamorphosis”, you’ll know that while it’s a fantastic story… It is definitely not a “fun” one.

It shook me to my core and left me extremely thoughtful of how society treats disabled people.

But… I wanted cool bug transformation?

I felt betrayed, in a sense, that the book presented Gregor’s ordeal as the “worst thing that could’ve happened ever”. Of course, for the metaphor, and the point of the story, it was a perfect match.

However, I couldn’t shake out the feeling that “transformation as punishment” was the usual modus operandi of most writers who dabbled in the theme. It was the eternal “Beauty and the Beast” situation. Look, he was turned into a huge monster! What a tragedy!

My man… You’re a huge fucking monster? Make use of that shit!

Of course, I’m being silly. After all, hard to see “huge fucking monster” as something desirable in medieval France.

Even if you go way back in time, to pull a bit from Greek Mythology… Spiders literally only exist because Athena wanted to teach a mortal not to be jealous. So of course she turns her into one as punishment.

What I’m getting at is… While transformation “to make a point” as a metaphor in a story is rather common, from fables to fairy tales to modern fantasy stories, to mythology… the amount of art that uses transformation as a method of positive catharsis or self-fulfillment for the characters is very, very little.

And this method just never… Vibed with me? Being a transformation enjoyer ™️, I hard time wrapping my head around as to why all of this art indulged in what is essentially the same way to portray and talk about transformation? Why did it always have to be something bad?

Kafka… I’m sorry, but giant bugs are cool.

I could spend more time explaining how these themes are used in a “moral of the story” kind of way, but I think everyone’s seen enough of this to get my point. Probably.

So here’s the thing. To me this is a perfectly valid narrative or thematic trope. It’s cool really! I’m just tired of it!

To me, transformation was always so much more about self-realization, about attaining that ideal form or finally living the life you want to live. And even if it’s a surprise, letting the subjects get used to their new situation, to learn how to make the best use of it, to find joy and comfort in the situation they find themselves into. To me those are the themes and emotions transformation art is absolutely revolutionary at evoking.

Give me the stories in which the mad scientist turns into a lizard to cure cancer, or one where the hero becomes powerful enough to beat the bad guy by turning into a huge dragon, let the princess finally experience gender euphoria by asking a witch to turn her into a minotaur, let the abandoned protagonist find a new family along with their new form.

I think I might just be repeating myself at this point

So what’s the point of this mini essay thing?

None, really.
I just wanted to talk about one of my favorite tropes around. I still think it’s a bit underused to it’s full potential, narratively.

I was pleasantly surprised, for example, to see some transformation indulgence on the writing of the recently released Baldur’s Gate 3... but again it comes with the caveats. Why yes I would like to become a squidperson with a huge brain! What do you mean I lose my soul and die in the process?…

I won’t blame the writers for this, they’re just following D&D lore. But regardless, it’s still possible to read this process of transformation as a welcome change, as giving your protagonist agency and power. But that’d be another discussion entirely, especially regarding that game.

In the end, I think a lot of writers would ask themselves, “No one would want to become a huge bug, would they?”

And my answer is: MORE PEOPLE THAN YOU’D THINK ACTUALLY

And I haven't even touched on how much this also intersects with transhumanism... Part 2 sometime?

Edit: I've had this in my drafts for MONTHS, and just now I noticed I wrote "it's" instead of "its" oh my god


You must log in to comment.

in reply to @explorermoo's post:

OH YES! I'd freaking love to hear you rambling more about that stuff actually~ as another transformation appreciator, this subject makes my brain go "OOOOOO"~

(and as you've seen on my page before, transhumanism is something that also picked my interest uwu).

(“Beauty and the Beast” situation. Look, he was turned into a huge monster! What a tragedy!
My man… You’re a huge fucking monster? Make use of that shit!" - yeah exactly, me hating this movie when I was a teen because I was disappointed he turns back into a human >.>)

"Oh no but you lose YOUR HUMANITY" is always seen as something terrible

A sacrifice.
A wrong

JOJO I REJECT MY HUMANITY but portrayed as something JOYOUS, good, why someone would want to shed it

Ugh.
Happy, desired, affirming, empowering.
That is something to be thought of.

btw greatly respect and agree with the actual point of this post how transformation as catharsis is greatly underrepresented as an idea in literature but huge insects are like one of the things i am most known to love specifically so i cant help but focus on that

Transformation as a means to become non-human; in the sense of the largely anthropocentric literatures to be non-human is to be undesirable— an opposing force or a scorned figure. Take for instance the end of The Incredible Melting Man in which the melted man, a monster, is deposited into the garbage in place of a proper burial.

HELL YES GIVE US THAT THEMATIC THEORY JUICE

I'm reminded of a video I saw recently covering the classic Pinnochio Plotline and how that trope has evolved from its original source material of "You should always want to be the most human you can be even if society disagrees that you being yourself is a human uwu" to "Hey that original take is actually really fucked up, how about we instead learn to accept that Pinnochio IS a real boy as he already is and help him learn how to be himself more comfortably?"

I think that both of these ideas have a lot to do with the idea that, in much older literature, being physically human is a metaphor for conforming with social ideals, whereas modern storytelling is much more open to both (A) the concept of transhumanism and (B) confronting the traditions and systems that we as humans have taken for granted in our upbringing.

Mhmh, the Pinnochio comparison is quite interesting owo It could even be read as a gender-affirming story if you think about it ~

Yeah for sure, in older stories taking a form of another creature always serves a moral purpose or a plot device. It rarely is to represent any other concepts.

"To me, transformation was always so much more about self-realization, about attaining that ideal form or finally living the life you want to live."

This is it, right here! This is why I keep coming back to transformation stories and keep seeking them out. The joyous euphoria of becoming. Of finding yourself as more than you were after the transformation rather than less. It is empowering too, in a specifically queer way, to find value in the forms and shapes that society has told us over and over again are repulsive and monstrous. To strut in unabashed confidence with our fangs, scales, antenna, and fur!

I've also encountered the various versions of the "transformation is punishment" even from sections of the TF community. And while I can understand the appeal, it has never been the burning white core of what has drawn me to the exploration of transformation. Wonderful essay, thanks for writing!

It’s certainly clear how TF stories can attract queer folk, not only with the possibility of gender-affirming TFs and whatnot but the whole thing about being turned into something undesirable and still finding love, joy and community is such a great potential these stories have.

Agreed, I respect folk who wanna indulge in that specific take, but it really isn’t for me x3 I’d much rather get my wish fulfillment TF fantasy rather than Aesop’s Fables 2.0 xP

Thank you for reading and I’m happy you enjoyed it ^^ 💜

This is extremely funny to me while also being a very good piece of writing
Thumbs up from a gal who loves TF both for personal reasons and as a literary device (and wishes she saw more positive incarnations)

I was in high school, so this was... 2008-2010? I was, VERY interested in this book about time travel!
H.G. Wells' Time Machine is not Back to the Future.
It is a deeply depressing idea of what the far future will look like. (It also might just be difficult to read and I don't know how much of that is just me.)

It's been a while since I read it so I can't really comment on the "difficult to read" bit.
The rest tho? Yeah, it's interesting speculative fiction? But it's also post-apocalyptic and loaded with his time's prejudices and preconceptions.
And yeah, pretty depressing in general! So I can understand if you went into it expecting fun how that would feel as a betrayal x3

...Kafka's Metamorphosis actually came up once when I was discussing something else with my family and I actually tried to make a similar point.
It wasn't even that long ago now.

I won't say "smart minds think alike" because I don't actually like myself very much, but I will say "small world" and "you're pretty cool."