Quelklef

milk consumer

girly but not a girl

name-color: #C09


folly
@folly

you ever notice that the word "elaborate" is literally "having-put-labor-into-it"? etymonline says elaborate (adj.) 1590s, "wrought by labor", which I think is a canny way to put it. hey that thing has detail and/or a kind of grandeur. someone worked to make it so


Quelklef
@Quelklef

other ones:

  • disintegrate is dis-integrate is "undo integration"
  • i've heard that "wisdom" (wise-dom) had original meaning something like "ability to see the world clearly"
  • information as in-formation as "a bunch of data put into a meaningful structure"
  • individuation as in-dividuation as in-division

sometimes these things really change how i look at a word. just wish i could remember any of the ones ive thought of 🤒. (of the above, only the first is "mine", and that one doesn't feel that insightful to me)


You must log in to comment.

in reply to @folly's post:

in reply to @Quelklef's post:

Whoa that "wisdom" one is a bit of a ride. Okay, so like, there was a split in Old English of one root word into "wise" and "wit", one with wisdom might be a wizard, one with wit would be a wita, and perhaps may be called to the witena gemot (assembly of wita), which is the earliest form of Parliament in the UK. "Parliament" is the French name, after all, this is the native Anglo-Saxon name.

But "wit" meaning "vision" or "sense" is still in living memory! "Knocked the wits out of him" or "witless" or "keep your wits about you" etc etc. And I mean, "sense" itself kind of has the opposite end of the doublet, why is "sensible" about thinking, "nonsense" is gibberish, and yet "sensitive" and "sense" itself and even "insensible" are about feelings? I mean, in a way, "I think, therefore I am" kinda came along and ruined it! (The fucking rationalists strike again!) you can see before the influence of that philosophy, thinking and feeling were much more synonymous, to the point that we still conflate "sentient" (literally "having feeling") with "sapient" ("having thought") in AI discussions to this day!

Oh and to wrap up the bow, those words are all distantly related to Latin vidi "I saw", which eventually became "vision" and "video" in English, so the "seeing/thinking" duality goes back basically to the beginning.

Edit: I'm upgrading this to a share lol