Reba-Rabbit

I'm just here to play around ;3

  • She/Her

NSFW (18+ only) /40yo/An exceptionally busty little rust haired rabbit who winds up being smeared on the highway every once in a while. You can call me Reba or Roadkill, whichever you prefer <3


website-league
@website-league
alloyed
@alloyed asked:

hihihi i have no interest in running my own node, and probably the moonlighting clause in my contract would make things dicey for no reason anyways, but i wanted to ask:

one way of analyzing Cohost is that it did Good Things, but that even in so doing it couldn't make enough money to support 4 people working on it full-time. So. if we want a successor network continue having Good Things without a much bigger userbase or some alternate means of funding, it needs to be less of a time investment on its creators. That way they can sustainably keep at it as a hobby and not as an Unpaid Job.

does this vibe with internal convos? using existing software is one way to make it cheaper to support but I honestly have no idea if keeping things Confederated would mean less or more work for individual participants

We are using existing software: currently GoToSocial and Akkoma are the ones that we are prioritizing patch efforts on, in order to support our needs as a site. Patches for other software will eventually happen; our hope is to have a diverse array of types of nodes.

Our current guidance (though not yet formalized) is that any instance operator should try to keep their node to a manageable number of users for their moderation team. This means no open enrollment; operators should either manually approve accounts as people apply to join, or set their community to invite-only. That has the side effect of keeping obvious bad actors out.

The intent is that, while there is still the same workload (plus federation and governance overhead), it is spread out among a much greater number of people. It's much easier to moderate a site with 50-100 people on it than it is to moderate a site with 20,000 people on it.

This also means that nodes will not require the computing and financial resources of, say, a Mastodon node with a large number of users. GoToSocial is lightweight software, and it should be easy for most instance operators to pay for their hosting out-of-pocket. Our central infrastructure is a little more heavyweight, but so far, it's being paid for by one of our members.


You must log in to comment.

in reply to @website-league's post:

One thing I'll add, is that personally, I'm striving to reduce the friction for both operators and users on the Website League overall, especially the technical burdens of maintenance and server/system administration special to running an ActivityPub instance. These changes probably won't land during this early phase, but hopefully soon, installing something to join the League can be as smooth as setting up something like a blog or a forum on your server's control panel.