Sheri

its worth fighting for 🌷

Writer of word both truth and tale. Video producer, editor, artist, still human. Hire me?

Check #writeup for The Good Posts.
β€”

Slowly making a visual novel called We Will Not See Heaven, demo is free. Sometimes I stream, or post adult things. Boys' love novel enthusiast. Take care, yeah?

πŸ’ŸπŸ’ŸπŸ’Ÿ
TECH CAN ONLY BE AS KIND TO US AS WE ARE TO ONE ANOTHER.


πŸ–₯️ blog
sherishaw.net/blog

Sheri
@Sheri

actually, you know what IGN? fuck you

it IS the responsibility of the reviewer to present the product as it exists in the world. the idea that games should be reviewed on purely objective measures, and that discussion of the story or the game's presence in the world is a separate issue, assumes that the game exists as just those mechanisms. just a shooty wizard game where you blast the bad guys, bang bang!

(dont think too hard about why the bad guys look the way they do)

video games have stories in them. stories exist in our world. culture is built around plenty of things, and that includes stories! religions and myths are built on stories

harry potter has such a cultural presence in the world that its creator could stand up on stage and call for the hanging of trans folk, and plenty of people would still ride the funny wizard motorcycle in the theme park. art sans artist, right? stripping creators' works from their motivational context is surely the ethical thing to do. no wonder we're at the point where AI art can be called anything but theft

anyways, so. video games are art. we all agreed on that like sixteen discourses ago, right? if not, we'll circle back to it in the next discourse

if games are art, then video game critics should be assumed to do double-duty as art critics, no? sure, some people are better at understanding or talking about pure gameplay, others at art. maybe the mass layoffs caught all the art critics!

or, they left because they weren't being paid enough. anyways.

in the case of the funny wizard game, to say "it's not our job to address this franchise culturally, or its creator" passes the buck of finding all that out onto the consumer. sure wish there was a place i could go to learn about why people are boycotting this video game, but i guess not you, video game journalism website. that's not your job after all, according to you.

sure glad that video games exist outside of all lived reality! imagine if a precedent of games critics not addressing political or moral issues in and around the media was set. god, the kind of things malicious game studios could get away with!

better be sure to nip that in the bud before the military industrial complex uses a popular yearly release as marketing and indoctrination in young up-and-coming purple heart scouts

anyways. yeah, actually, you are supposed to tell people the wizard lady is a far-right bigot


Sheri
@Sheri

you don't get to claim neutrality and then run a headline so puffy even the new york times cringed


You must log in to comment.

in reply to @Sheri's post:

I'd recommend not bothering with it. It's really freaking anti-semitic.

I'm also not convinced Rowling wasn't involved with the game, as from what she's stated, it sounds like she did have some influence... also, a lot of the money from the game still goes to her due to licensing, so....

Rowling is on record saying that she takes the ongoing royalty checks as tacit support for her and her opinions. Even if she wasn't directly involved with the writing, she is still the rotten heart of the thing.