Sheri

its worth fighting for 🌷

Writer of word both truth and tale. Video producer, editor, artist, still human. Hire me?

Check #writeup for The Good Posts.

Slowly making a visual novel called We Will Not See Heaven, demo is free. Sometimes I stream, or post adult things. Boys' love novel enthusiast. Take care, yeah?

💟💟💟
TECH CAN ONLY BE AS KIND TO US AS WE ARE TO ONE ANOTHER.


🖥️ blog
sherishaw.net/blog

atomicthumbs
@atomicthumbs

compare my photograph (first image) with the version Bluesky serves users when they load it at full size (second image). It's fucked! They've fucked my photo. I worked hard to create and maintain my grit and they go and soften it. Unacceptable

(edit: you may need to zoom in on account of the lightbox shrinking the presented size with more than one photo here. or just open in a new tab to view it at 100% size)


You must log in to comment.

in reply to @atomicthumbs's post:

they're slightly different sizes, even!!
granted i'm not aware of the intricacies of image compression, but the size of the image seems like an important factor to maintain

(...is that normal? i hope it isnt but i wouldnt be surprised...)

I'm going insane. I think I see a difference* in the lightbox but when I expand the images and switch between them, nothing. *could be caused be the left and right side of the picture being different color, though

i wonder how much of this is the downscaling to 1600x2000 and how much is actually jpeg overload... i'll guess jpeg load anyways though, downscaling shouldn't look this bad

EDIT: Saw the followup, the answer is 50/50... and why the heck is it upscaling!?