• she/they

I draw unhinged women and buff guys.
NSFW: @Booberkiak

Contact me on Discord:
superkiakart



Lilirulu
@Lilirulu

Krita's "Fast Lineart"/AI lineart even if they're trying to do it the right "most ethical" way, I am left wondering, based on the examples they gave, is it actually nessecary??? Turning a sketch to lineart isn't new.

I turned shitty doodles on lined notepaper into lineart with just photoshop when I was kid.

Like objectively; How they're doing it is fine but it's just like idk suck it up and do the lineart or find a style that doesn't use lineart????????? And depending on the program a lot of the tedium is already reduced if you know how to use them. Vector lines in CSP can reduce a lot of issues because you can freely go back and clean them up (unless you're me and hate forgetting to use the right tools).

Link: https://krita-artists.org/t/introducing-a-new-project-fast-line-art/94265


You must log in to comment.

in reply to @Lilirulu's post:

i think the thing that leaves me fine with it is the fact that the feature is sponsored by intel. since it’s not deigned to cause any harm and they didn’t even pay for the feature, there’s really no reason for it to not exist besides “i won’t use it”, and every art program has tons of features that 90% of people don’t use. imo these sorts of things are also what make photoshop so enduring, even if 90% of the features you won’t use, eventually there’ll still be the 10% of features you cannot live without and will keep you using krita for the rest of your life. idk

"Okay but why?" definitely sums up my feelings here. Seems like it would take away too much of the individual style to be doing linework algorithmically like that. Hope they're getting paid well to develop it at least.

i mentioned it in my comment, but they said the feature was sponsored by intel. usually those sorts of things come with lots of conditions, so intel would be like, “we’d like to sponsor your next feature, but it has to be ai-related” or something along those lines.