TalenLee

As Yet Untitled Work

I'm Talen! I make videos and articles and games and graphic designs and guides and messes and encouragement. Chances are you can find anything I do on my blog. I like it when you comment on my things, so please do!


I see talks about Generative Art Enthusiasts, and one of the things that strikes me as surprising is how often people will describe seeing a homogenity of opinions on the topic, which also happen to align with the stupidest fuckers in the world who aren't good at making reasonable points.

This is interesting to me because it isn't my experience, but even the people with other thoughts about the toolkit are pushed to present in a similar defensive crouch because they'll be addressed as if they are those other people.

When people want to show me these shitty opinions and arguments about generative media, it inevitably comes to a twitter thread link, or screenshots of a twitter thread, and to that I kinda wonder if maybe the problem is that twitter is full of shitheads? Have we considered that there's a spotlighting fallacy at work here?


You must log in to comment.

in reply to @TalenLee's post:

There's definitely a phenomenon where when a certain individual/group/product/concept has been deemed "bad", certain people on the "good" side deem it acceptable to just make shit up in their criticism as if it won't have any negative consequences.

That said, I think the issue you're talking about is entirely explained by the current twitter policy of putting the replies of paid blue checks at the top.