• All except He/Him

🔞. Journal, art sharing, and shitchosting blog of a giant soul. My name is Blue Skies, and I want to make the world a better place.

Dieselpunk Fiction:
@BoundlessVolume
Macro Pokémon Kink Fic:
@DynamaxIsUnbreakable

You must log in to comment.

in reply to @QuakeRoc's post:

The funny thing about "furry fandom" is it's never been... about being fans of one thing that exists in any solid way. Dr. Who fandom? Dr. Who is a specific thing! Furry? It's much more amorphous. It's definitely a subculture, it's just funny that it ever became known as "fandom" at all.

It's more in keeping with the sci-fi and fantasy fandoms that were around at the time furry was new. Early furry fanzines look a lot like sci-fi and fantasy fanzines of the 70s, too. I feel like it's more just that "fandom" means something different now

That's fair. It is derived from being the funny animals fandom, as a subset of animation fans, in the 70s beginnings. And "fan" had just come to be shortened from "fanatic" then, so it was really a term describing the passion of the people engaging in it back then.

good choice! something about the term “furry fandom” has always kinda been an awkward one to me. it’s like… I’m a fan… of furries? but I am one? i’m a fan of myself then??

It just feels like it makes a lot more sense thinking of it as the “furry community” or “furry culture” or furry something-other-than-fandom

yeah! i've been using "furry community" for i-can't-even-count-how-many months at this point, since, yk, "fandom" refers to a produced thing. although using "culture" is better, to be honest. so i'll support that absolutely.