• he/him

Coder, pun perpetrator
Grumpiness elemental
Hyperbole abuser


Tools programmer
Writer-wannabe
Did translations once upon a time
I contain multitudes


(TurfsterNTE off Twitter)


Trans rights
Black lives matter


Be excellent to each other


UE4/5 Plugins on Itch
nte.itch.io/

vectorpoem
@vectorpoem

I got told to "chill out" "let people enjoy things" a lot back then ("it's just part of the culture" "do you hate fun?"), but I was completely right that it's done long term damage to the usefulness of reviews in general, something devs depend on for visibility and their very livelihoods. Hopefully this is a step in the right direction.

I saw very clearly what the "Funny" rating was really for with this review from 2015 where someone told a racist joke and dozens of gleeful hitler youths in the comments ate it right up. To some valve moderator's credit, that review was eventually deleted, though the comments are still there as a sparkling monument to steam's user culture.

Plenty of "funny" reviews weren't like this, but this one was a nice vivid illustration of how fundamental a derailing of an important platform function they were (still are, seemingly - this pushes the ongoing infospill out of sight rather than staunches or stops it), and all for... what, exactly? Musk-esque "le epic meme" yuks? Unserious company, ironically. Plenty of great places online to post jokes, folks.


You must log in to comment.

in reply to @vectorpoem's post:

I recently saw that someone left a positive review for one of my games that was just an ASCII picture of a butt and I'm astonished that people pay actual money for the privilege to post early 2000 era Forum jokes.

"surface the stuff the most people have read" is itself a self-reinforcing dynamic, if a platform cares about quality it has to have some sort of "eat your vegetables" criteria classifier otherwise you just get "the person who can tell their (probably off-topic) joke the loudest"

I always felt the "funny" option existed purely to stop upvoted joke reviews from counting the same as normal helpful reviews. So I'm surprised this wasn't already the case.

IMHO this is also a side-effect of the collapse of critical culture and institutions putting too much weight on stuff like user reviews.

Valve of course have a "Our system was never designed for this!"/"We're not unhappy that steam reviews are disproportionately important" plausible deniability thing going on that makes things even worse on top of that.

steam's user culture is absolute garbage.

a little side thing i wanna point out is the "clown" award; getting a award gives you steam points so you can buy little decorative things (that are usually Anime Titties or stolen art) for your profile, so people have started deliberately being an asshole to farm clown awards.

hell, even normal takes like "don't upload people's mods without their permission" get spammed with clown awards because they're extremely visible (appearing at the top of the review/discussion post) and are basically used to bully people.