I've got people trying to argue with me about game balance. These are people that think an attack that hits more targets and only needs to roll at least 3 on 2d6 is not OP, but an attack that hits one target for slightly more damage and needs to roll at least 7 is.
Mostly ttrpg stuff and a lil art.
Ko-Fi
ko-fi.com/twinkeeGoblin
goblin.band/@TwinkeeNeocities (WIP, just throwing it up here while I can)
twinkee.neocities.org/You must log in to comment.
in reply to @Twinkee's post:
"This multi-target could deal 5 times the damage of the single target, if every space was filled" "But each hit is 2 points less!"
"My wizard can only cast 9 levelled spells and infinite cantrips a day, while the fighter can swing his sword all day with no effect! My spells SHOULD be stronger!"
"You want them to end encounters in 1 go"
"Yeah!"
"And invalidate non-combat encounters"
"uh huh!"
"and how is that fair?"
"Because he can swing a sword all day!"