• he/him

zuthal/zuzu - 27 - 🇩🇪
queer weird mlem honse
male but low energy
audhd
🔞 a lot of horny posting with lots of kinks 🔞
politically vaguely bottom leftist
believes in the separation between fiction and reality
big huge nerd for space, biotech, stem and scifi stuff in general
player of nerdy games
also hunter of monsters
switch friend code SW-7844-0530-4225
Pretendo Network Friend Code 2545-4843-1202
discord zuthal
please ask me questions, both nerdy and horny welcome


dreadwedge
@dreadwedge

February
Check out this cool antique globe I found in my uncle's attic. Anyone know who the manufacturer is? #myfirstglobe

March
Looking for advice: what's a good desk-globe for beginners that's affordable but still turns smoothly? #GlobeEnthusiast

May
Wow, I made the jump to a full-swing meridian mount and y'all weren't kidding, this thing feels amazing to spin. I can barely keep my hands off it. #FrictionlessRevolution

August
Which has a higher RPM ceiling, an Edmonton 4500 (w/ the walnut standing-cradle), or the new Earheart Meticulous XL? Assuming I replace the stock bearings and grease regularly obviously. #WorldTurnt

October
I mean ultimately the problem with topographic globes is you're always gonna be sacrificing some speed for accuracy right. It doesn't matter how well calibrated the electromagnets in your hovermount are; any amount of raised relief throws off your center of mass. #smooth

December
Guys I think we need to level the Himalayas


Zuthal
@Zuthal

The real problem with a relief globe is not the mass distribution (that can, and with a quality one should, be compensated by internal balance masses) but the fact that a non-smooth surface has a lot more air resistance, so they end up spinning down a lot faster

Can encase it in a smooth shell of clear or very light blue epoxy (representing the appropriately-scaled atmosphere) of course to alleviate that, but it's really hard to get such a complex shape free of bubbles, and of course you can't touch the relief then anymore.


You must log in to comment.

in reply to @dreadwedge's post: