• they/them

interactions and asks wanted
I'm a writer, artist, and game developer. Currently working on Unknown Station Echo, a translation-based mystery.
cohost now! no ads. no tracking. yes eggbug. cohost: join now.


Discord
Send me an ask (prev interactions only, please be over 18)

Just thinking about the instructor I had who was adamant that dark mode is "just better" and would keep bringing up the reduced consumption on OLED screens, etc. and I had to sit there fuming in silence because

  1. I checked and Website Carbon gives his personal business website an F, so clearly he's well beyond the point where fucking DARK MODE is providing any meaningful advantage, that thing CHUGS on my laptop
  2. It's the exact opposite on LCD screens—solid white is the least energized state of a liquid crystal while solid black is maximally energized, so until CSS starts listening for a user agent value representing the minimal resource state of the monitor (black for CRT and OLED, white for LCD and paper,1 etc.), you cannot prove that Joe Schmoe's budget PC will save energy with dark mode
  3. Dark mode is useful for some disabled people in some situations but if you try to go against the dark mode evangelists and say it isn't always best, you will be treated as if you must be either misinformed or stupid to not agree with them... despite the reasons a person might avoid dark mode ALSO often stemming from disability

Then again this instructor also waved off the concept of accessibility, saying it'd be nice but it's not a priority so. not really aligned with my design philosophy.


  1. I mention paper in part bc his website has no print CSS, so if someone attempted to print it, it would be at massive personal expense (so much ink! so much toner!!!) and most of the pages would be superfluous


You must log in to comment.

in reply to @aliengeo's post:

[...] until CSS starts listening for a user agent value representing the minimal resource state of the monitor

that would be super cool honestly, but i don't think the people running the web care sadly :/

i only have a prefer-color-scheme block in my css right now but i should look into making it printable someday. i didn't know about Website Carbon, my website is a B apparently so i'm wondering how i could make it better. EDIT: worked on it and i got to A+ easily except for my gallery, so i'll work on that :yeah:

do you have opinions and/or data on alternative protocols such as gemini and gopher? i used to have a gopher mirror but i dropped it due to maintenance issues, but i really liked having one, conceptually it almost aligned with my principles. i don't know if it makes such a drastic difference in practice compared to a plaintext http website though

Yeah unfortunately there are a lot of good ideas in the CSS spec that are entirely or almost entirely unimplemented (still waiting on prefers-reduced-data 🤞) and really speak to the homogenization of the web :/

Website Carbon is an estimate, ofc, bc they can't test on every device and connection, so I'd say that's still pretty good! And at least if you have a gallery page people are expecting it to load images. Maybe image breakpoints would help, if you don't already have them? (I say as my website gets an A+ because I haven't worked on it since putting up an "under construction" page last year 😅)

I've heard about Gemini and Gopher in passing but honestly I think the graphic aspect of the web is important to me. Going into more detail about that is going to make this a very unwieldy comment so I'll just make a separate post haha

i don't have image breakpoints no, i created previews by hand all under 1mb, which was pretty sane when i had 5 images on there but much less so from the point where it got over 100 lol. i should've aimed for around 50kb in hindsight i figure. gosh i wish jpeg xl was a thing

i started putting the work in reworking my gallery after reading your post anyway. i remember the current one crashing on my (quite old but decent) phone and i don't consider that to be acceptable