amikumanto

And the ultimate bloging begins

  • she/her

28 / autistic / Toronto



dismallyOriented
@dismallyOriented

Howdy folks, let's get this post on the road.

Today's marine science fact is: ocean food webs and the biological pump!

Technically, the origin of this particular spiel begins in 2022, after seeing this whalefall comic by grubloved on tumblr. (https://grubloved.tumblr.com/post/629810577831837696/thinking-about-whale-falls-inspired-by-the-work)

The short version is, some people looked at this evocative-as-hell comic, and went "damn, imagine how dark it would be to realize that manna from the heavens is actually dead bodies". And unfortunately for me and everyone involved, the biggest baddest "WELL ACTUALLY-" came tumbling out of my mouth.

Because the thing is, to people who live on land and aren't generally scavengers, this is gonna seem pretty grim! Whalefalls are an object of fascination, because yeah, the death of such a charismatic and giant animal is a tragic thing, and there's this general melancholic throughline of a tragic death going on to breed subaltern pockets of life way way down where nobody involved has ever seen the light of a sun. Circle of life stuff. But the thing is, because of how the ocean works, the majority of life in the ocean relies on dead things falling from the surface.

Diagram of ocean zones. The "photic zone" runs from the surface to 200m depth, while the "aphotic zone" goes from 200m all the way down to the seafloor at 10,000m.

The thing you need to know about the ocean is that it's deep as hell. Truly baffling depth scales. If you have about 15-20 min to kill, I'd recommend going to https://neal.fun/deep-sea/ and just scrolling for a while if you really want a sense of what we're working with. All this to say, there are 10,000m worth of environment, and only 100-200m of it has access to sunlight (i.e. the photic zone). And that's before you think about things like water clarity that could make that light slice even smaller. In the same way that all land-based food webs rely on plant photosynthesis to exist, the entire oceanic food web has to rely on whatever photosynthesis can happen in that light layer.1

Thankfully, phytoplankton are some of the most efficient motherfuckers on the planet. Their size is precisely what makes them efficient - because they're a single cell, they can suck water and nutrients directly from their environment, and their entire body is devoted to photosynthesis, unlike trees which only photosynthesize with their leaves. If your lawn photosynthesized at the rate that plankton did, you'd have to mow it every day or every few hours. They are, as I put it in my original tumblr post, "shitting out organic matter all the time".

Just like phytoplankton are efficient, so too are the zooplankton that eat them. They're the microscopic animals to these microscopic plants. They can graze through a phytoplankton bloom almost as quickly as it grows. And here's where the transition to the bigger guys down the food chain begins. Some of this stuff gets eaten by animals who feed at the surface - the typical "plant -> herbivore -> carnivore" chain.2 But some of it leaves the surface. As phytoplankton die, or get eaten by zooplankton, they will get transported from the photic zone at the surface, to deeper and darker zones. Either because the phytoplankton have started sinking, or because the zooplankton have digested the phytoplankton and turned them into a nice heavy fecal pellet. And much like raindrops in a cloud, these little pieces of dead organic matter can bump into each other and start aggregating into bigger clumps.

Marine snow, white particles of organic matter falling through the ocean. The camera is pointed toward the snow, showing motion blur as they fall toward the viewer.

This particulate matter, also known as marine snow, makes up most of what deeper organisms eat. On an annual scale, about 10.2 gigatons of carbon are transferred from the surface to the bottom of the ocean through this "dead things falling" pipeline. Yeah, sometimes you will get "large particles" like a whale, or a fish, or some other animal that sinks and falls to the bottom. (It is also extremely funny to think of such a large being getting referred to as a particle.) But this rain of surface matter supports most of the ocean by volume - not the living phytoplankton, but their dead and digested matter. This is what feeds fish, worms, crabs, all the middle-of-the-chain things that go on to feed the bigger fish. This is what draws carbon from the surface to be decomposed into the seawater by bacteria or get buried into sediment, where it stays for hundreds and hundreds of years. This is the bedrock upon which the deep ocean food web runs. All that life in the dark, fed by the dead of the light.

And that's something I just think is beautiful.

Thank you all for joining me on this personal infodump fave. I'll sea you all next week!

Sources:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biological_pump
https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/facts/marinesnow.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marine_snow


  1. There are technically other forms of organic matter synthesis that aren't reliant on light (i.e. chemosynthesis). That's how deep sea vents work. But that's a whole different kettle of fish volcanic bundle of worms.

  2. There's some real interesting trophic level math about how whales can support themselves entirely on krill because they're so efficient at taking up what the phytoplankton are putting out.


@amikumanto shared with:

You must log in to comment.

in reply to @dismallyOriented's post:

Okay I've been thinking about this since you originally made this post but I'm curious if phytoplankton grow so rapidly due to their efficiency, does that mean there's a visible difference during the night vs the day? Or does fish sleeping -> less predation coincide with sun down -> less energy to make things about even or something?

I feel like my professor probably said Something about this back when he was lecturing on the topic but now I cannot recall precisely. Rippo in zippo

Okay so after looking some stuff up (https://oceanexplorer.noaa.gov/facts/vertical-migration.html) to double check: fishes and zooplankton don't necessarily share the same sleep/wake activity times as humans do. There are definitely daily cycles they do experience - "diel vertical migration" describes the daily movement of organisms to and from the surface, typically for food and shelter reasons. The thing is, most of these guys come up to the surface at night, not during the day. So the overall pattern is "phytoplankton grow like hell during the day" -> "zooplankton come up in the evening and graze like hell" -> repeat. Other forms of this migration also exist, with slightly different timing, but the bulk of it is this nocturnal pattern.

IIRC you generally have a pretty even split between phytoplankton growth and zooplankton grazing (with additional plankton consumption by viruses, btw), except for blooms, which are when you have some kind of wild explosion in photosynthesis and phytoplankton activity rates and their population outpaces grazing for a few days. Until they use up whatever nutrients they were pulling on at the surface, and also the zooplankton come track them down and feast on the remains. Blooms are honestly a lot of what the food chain relies on - in the same way that the ocean is deep, it's also just Really fucking Big spatially, so a lot of organisms rely on concentrated bursts of activity like this to track down food. A bloom means plankton and plankton means plankton-eaters, and so on and so on. It's kind of like how animals in the Serengeti will cluster around watering holes, except what if the watering holes formed spontaneously for a handful of days, and could pop up randomly in different places.

There is definitely a difference in things like water oxygen and CO2 levels, though. Satellites can track blooms remotely by looking for things like a sudden cold water spot on the ocean's surface, followed by a spike in chlorophyll levels. I can't remember if the gas measurements were also obtainable by satellite (edit: they aren't, at least not directly), but when scientists can track down a bloom and also have a boat ready and nearby, they can go to the bloom and take direct measurements. And these blooms deplete surface water CO2 so much that it actually sucks CO2 out of the air and into the water, to the point that some older studies proposed artificially starting plankton blooms in order to counteract global warming by sucking all the excess into the ocean where it'll get bio-pumped into the deep. (It's not a viable solution bc, y'know, knock-on effects, but that might be the part 2 post for this).

Ohhhh that's so fascinating!!

I guess it makes sense from a "not getting eaten by birds" perspective for fish to come near the surface at night haha. I feel like I've mostly seen blooms generally talked about as a bad thing related to climate change but I guess that might have just been a simplification for layperson consumption?

So blooms can be a bad thing - the usual kinds of blooms that make it to the news are for things like "red tide" in Florida, or other places. Essentially this is when a toxic phytoplankton species blooms and creates a huge concentration of Bad Shit in the water. Those toxins make it dangerous to swim, can be lethal to pets, and make shellfish unsafe to eat, bc they've eaten all the toxic plankton and built up concentration in their meat. The general scientific term is Harmful Algal Bloom (HAB), with specific species associated with different kinds of bloom (red tide, brown tide) or a specific disease/toxin. Higher temperatures and increased runoff (which pours extra nutrients into the water) lead to increased likelihood of HABs, which can also be tied to things like mass fish or seagrass die-offs because the explosion of phytoplankton eventually means 1) blocking sunlight to bottom-growing plants, 2) a fuckton of plankton which die and then suck all the oxygen out of the water when the bacteria go to town. So yeah, it's all about like, what species of plankton is involved, and where is the bloom happening.