staff
@staff

we're making a small post rendering change effective tomorrow at noon. in posts made before tomorrow at noon PDT, if you add image and audio attachments to the same post, the audio attachments always come last regardless of the order in which they're added; starting tomorrow, all the attachments will be displayed in the order you inserted them. this needed to be done in preparation for bigger improvements we're making to the editor soon, which we hope to start testing internally sometime this week.


jkap
@jkap

this is technically a new age of posting btw. we’re up to the 7th age now


You must log in to comment.

in reply to @staff's post:

Hey uh, could you make a policy change with zoophilia on your site or better moderate it, there is a lot of that content in some furry spaces here that just seems to be not being dealt with and my friend is considering leaving the site over it. I know there's already measures in place against csem and I wondered if measures like that could be taken for zoophilic content.

depending on the specific content (and no, i do not want a description nor a link), it would probably fall under

do not post content which is illegal in the United States

which should be reported through the report function

or

depictions of abuse, particularly of children or animals;

which would absolutely need a content warning, and should be reported through the reporting function if it isn't. be sure to use the filtering tools in your page settings as well - for some things, i might want to never see them, but they shouldn't be bannable.

if you're unsure or have more problems, hit them up at the support site?

I've noticed a few posts which were authored using either HTML or markdown to insert images in the body of a text seem to have broken within the past 1-3 days - is this related? Samples:

https://cohost.org/abstractcactus/post/2075550-div-a-href-https

https://cohost.org/makku/post/3895262-cool-vocalsynth-musi

It looks like both got their images translated into an <a href> with no link source instead of an image; I know for sure the second one was apparently inserted using markdown image syntax, according to the original poster.

in reply to @jkap's post: